首页> 外文期刊>Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics >Comparison of broad range 16S rDNA PCR to conventional blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn
【24h】

Comparison of broad range 16S rDNA PCR to conventional blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn

机译:广泛的16S rDNA PCR与常规血液培养用于新生儿败血症诊断的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Neonatal sepsis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates. The gold standard for detecting bacterial sepsis is blood culture. However, it has low sensitivity and a reporting delay of approximately 48–72h. Molecular assays for the detection of bacterial DNA represent possible new diagnostic tools for early identification of a bacterial cause. This study aimed at comparing a broad range 16S rDNA PCR to conventional blood culture for detecting bacterial DNA in blood samples from neonates with suspected sepsis. Fifty neonates with suspected sepsis, admitted at Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Ain Shams University Hospitals, were included in this study. From each neonate, a minimum of 2–3ml blood was collected by standard sterile procedures, 1ml for conventional blood culture and 1–2ml EDTA blood for PCR. The isolated microorganisms were identified by conventional microbiological methods. Thirty neonates (60%) gave positive blood culture results. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were Staphylococcus aureus ( n =17, 56.7%), followed by Coagulase negative Staphylococci ( n =7, 23.3%), Escherichia coli ( n =4, 13.3%), and Candida spp. ( n =2, 6.7%). Twenty-eight (56%) neonates gave positive bacterial blood culture while 35 (70%) neonates gave positive PCR results. Considering the blood culture as the gold standard in diagnosis of bacterial neonatal sepsis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of PCR in detecting bacteremia relative to blood cultures were 20/28 (71.42%), 7/22 (31.81%), 20/35 (57.14%) & 7/15 (46.66%), respectively. In conclusion, PCR approach appears to be a relatively easy, reliable and valuable complementary method for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis for samples obtained during antimicrobial treatment especially when routine cultures remain negative. Staphylococci spp. has played an important role in causing neonatal sepsis. So, implementation of simple infection control measures such as hand washing, barrier nursing and promotion of clean deliveries should be considered to reduce neonatal sepsis.
机译:新生儿败血症是新生儿发病和死亡的重要原因。检测细菌性败血症的金标准是血液培养。但是,它的灵敏度较低,报告延迟约为48-72h。用于检测细菌DNA的分子测定法代表了可能的新诊断工具,可用于早期识别细菌病因。这项研究旨在将广泛的16S rDNA PCR与常规血液培养进行比较,以检测怀疑患有败血症的新生儿血液样本中的细菌DNA。在本研究中纳入了50例疑似败血症的新生儿,他们被艾因斯姆斯大学医院的新生儿重症监护病房收治。通过标准无菌操作从每个新生儿中收集至少2–3ml血液,常规血液培养至少收集1ml血液,PCR收集1-2ml EDTA血液。通过常规微生物学方法鉴定分离的微生物。 30名新生儿(60%)的血培养结果为阳性。最常见的微生物是金黄色葡萄球菌(n = 17,56.7%),其次是凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(n = 7,23.3%),大肠杆菌(n = 4,13.3%)和假丝酵母。 (n = 2,6.7%)。 28名(56%)新生儿的细菌血液培养阳性,而35名(70%)新生儿的PCR结果阳性。以血培养为细菌性新生儿败血症诊断的金标准,相对于血培养,PCR检测菌血症的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为20/28(71.42%),7/22(31.81) %),20/35(57.14%)和7/15(46.66%)。总之,PCR方法似乎是一种相对简便,可靠且有价值的补充方法,可用于诊断在抗菌治疗期间获得的样品(尤其是当常规培养仍为阴性时)的新生儿败血症。葡萄球菌在引起新生儿败血症中发挥了重要作用。因此,应考虑采取简单的感染控制措施,例如洗手,进行障碍护理和促进清洁分娩,以减少新生儿败血症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号