首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey
【24h】

Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey

机译:肌筋膜疼痛综合征的患病率与有效治疗方法之间的差异:一项全国性横断面调查的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Myofascial pain is a common dysfunction with a lifetime prevalence affecting up to 85% of the general population. Current guidelines for the management of myofascial pain are not available. In this study we investigated how physicians on the basis of prescription behaviour evaluate the effectiveness of treatment options in their management of myofascial pain. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional, nationwide survey with a standardized questionnaire among 332 physicians (79.8% male, 25.6% female, 47.5 ± 9.6 years) experienced in treating patients with myofascial pain. Recruitment of physicians took place at three German meetings of pain therapists, rheumatologists and orthopaedists, respectively. Physicians estimated the prevalence of myofascial pain amongst patients in their practices, stated what treatments they used routinely and then rated the perceived treatment effectiveness on a six-point scale (with 1 being excellent). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Results The estimated overall prevalence of active myofascial trigger points is 46.1 ± 27.4%. Frequently prescribed treatments are analgesics, mainly metamizol/paracetamol (91.6%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/coxibs (87.0%) or weak opioids (81.8%), and physical therapies, mainly manual therapy (81.1%), TENS (72.9%) or acupuncture (60.2%). Overall effectiveness ratings for analgesics (2.9 ± 0.7) and physical therapies were moderate (2.5 ± 0.8). Effectiveness ratings of the various treatment options between specialities were widely variant. 54.3% of all physicians characterized the available treatment options as insufficient. Conclusions Myofascial pain was estimated a prevalent condition. Despite a variety of commonly prescribed treatments, the moderate effectiveness ratings and the frequent characterizations of the available treatments as insufficient suggest an urgent need for clinical research to establish evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome.
机译:背景技术肌筋膜疼痛是一种常见的功能障碍,终生患病率高达85%的普通人群。目前尚无肌筋膜疼痛管理指南。在这项研究中,我们调查了医生如何根据处方行为评估治疗选择的肌筋膜疼痛的有效性。方法我们采用标准化问卷对包括肌筋膜痛患者的332名医师(男性79.8%,女性25.6%,47.5±9.6岁)进行了横断面调查。分别在三届德国疼痛治疗师,风湿病学家和骨科医师会议上招募了医生。医师评估了患者在实践中肌筋膜疼痛的患病率,阐明了他们常规使用的治疗方法,然后以六分制评分(1分为优)来评估感知的治疗效果。数据表示为平均值±标准偏差。结果活动肌筋膜触发点的总体估计患病率为46.1±27.4%。常用的镇痛药是镇痛药,主要是美他唑/扑热息痛(91.6%),非甾体类抗炎药/ coxib(87.0%)或弱阿片类药物(81.8%),以及物理疗法,主要是人工疗法(81.1%),TENS( 72.9%)或针灸(60.2%)。镇痛药(2.9±0.7)和物理疗法的总体有效等级为中等(2.5±0.8)。不同专业之间各种治疗方案的有效性评级差异很大。 54.3%的医生认为可用的治疗方案不足。结论肌筋膜疼痛被认为是一种普遍的疾病。尽管有各种常用的处方治疗方法,但中等的疗效等级和可用治疗方法的频繁表征不足以表明临床研究迫切需要建立基于证据的肌筋膜疼痛综合征治疗指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号