首页> 外文学位 >Validation of a Pressure Pain Threshold Scale in Patients Diagnosed with Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Fibromyalgia.
【24h】

Validation of a Pressure Pain Threshold Scale in Patients Diagnosed with Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Fibromyalgia.

机译:经诊断为肌筋膜疼痛综合征和纤维肌痛的患者的压力疼痛阈值量表的验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Palpation is an examination technique used to diagnose and treat myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) and fibromyalgia (FM). Currently, there is no validated technique for classifying the results. A valid and reliable pressure pain threshold scale (PPTS) may provide a means for clinicians to grade, document, and report findings. The purpose of this dissertation was to validate a PPTS in patients diagnosed with MPS and FM. Design and Methods: An observational study. Participants who met the inclusion criteria were placed into three equal groups: MPS, FM, and control. All participants underwent one, two-part testing sessions using the American College of Rheumatology criteria. Part-I consisted of palpation with a digital pressure sensor and part-II utilized an algometer. For each tender point (18-total), the participants graded their level of discomfort using the visual analog scale (VAS) and manual tender point rating survey (MTPS) and the examiner graded their response using the PPTS (e.g. ordinal scale with increasing severity from 0-4). Analysis: Intrarater reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient model 3, k. Concurrent validity between the PPTS, VAS, and MTPS was calculated using the spearman rank correlation coefficient. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the minimal cut-off value between groups. Results: Eighty-four participants were included in the analysis. The PPTS had good intrarater reliability (ICC ≥.88). A moderate to excellent relationship was found between the PPTS and VAS for all groups with the algometer and digital pressure sensor (rho ≥.61). A moderate to excellent relationship was found between the PPTS and MTPS for all groups with the algometer (rho≥.68) and for the MPS and control group with the digital pressure sensor (rho ≥.71). There was a little to moderate relationship (rho=.01-.50) between the PPTS and MTPS for the FM group with the digital pressure sensor. A cut-off value of 2 on the PPTS differentiated participants with MPS and FM from controls. Discussion: The results provide preliminary evidence validating the PPTS for patients with MPS and FM. Future research should determine interrater reliability, diagnostic accuracy, and efficacy of the PPTS with other chronic pain and orthopedic conditions.
机译:背景:触诊是一种用于诊断和治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)和纤维肌痛(FM)的检查技术。当前,没有经过验证的技术可以对结果进行分类。有效和可靠的压力疼痛阈值量表(PPTS)可以为临床医生提供分级,记录和报告发现的方法。本文的目的是验证诊断为MPS和FM的患者的PPTS。设计与方法:一项观察性研究。符合纳入标准的参与者分为三个相等的组:MPS,FM和对照组。所有参与者均按照美国风湿病学会标准进行了分为两部分的测试。第一部分由带有数字压力传感器的触诊组成,第二部分则采用了血凝仪。对于每个压痛点(总共18个),参与者使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和人工压痛点评分调查(MTPS)对他们的不适程度进行评分,而检查员使用PPTS对他们的反应进行评分(例如,严重程度从高到低的顺序量表)从0-4)。分析:使用类内相关系数模型3 k来计算内部评价者可靠性。使用spearman等级相关系数计算PPTS,VAS和MTPS之间的并发有效性。接收器工作特性曲线用于确定组之间的最小截止值。结果:八十四名参与者被纳入分析。 PPTS具有良好的评分者内部信度(ICC≥.88)。对于所有组,在使用血压计和数字压力传感器(rho≥0.61)的情况下,PPTS和VAS之间存在中等至极好的关系。在所有组中,使用血压计(rho≥.68)以及使用数字压力传感器的MPS和对照组(rho≥.71)在PPTS和MTPS之间发现了中等至极好的关系。使用数字压力传感器的FM组的PPTS和MTPS之间存在一点到中等的关系(rho = .01-.50)。 PPTS的临界值为2,使MPS和FM参与者与对照组有所区别。讨论:结果为MPS和FM患者的PPTS验证提供了初步证据。未来的研究应确定PPTS在其他慢性疼痛和骨科疾病中的可靠性,诊断准确性和功效。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cheatham, Scott W.;

  • 作者单位

    Nova Southeastern University.;

  • 授予单位 Nova Southeastern University.;
  • 学科 Physical therapy.;Physiology.;Pathology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 128 p.
  • 总页数 128
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号