...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nephrology >Safety of low-molecular-weight heparin compared to unfractionated heparin in hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Safety of low-molecular-weight heparin compared to unfractionated heparin in hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:低分子量肝素与普通肝素相比在血液透析中的安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have been extensively studied and became the treatment of choice for several indications including pulmonary embolism. While their efficacy in hemodialysis is considered similar to unfractionated heparin (UFH), their safety remains controversial mainly due to a risk of bioaccumulation in patients with renal impairment. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the safety of LMWH when compared to UFH for extracorporeal circuit (ECC) anticoagulation. Methods We used Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane central register of controlled trials, Trip database and NICE to retrieve relevant studies with no language restriction. We looked for controlled experimental trials comparing LMWH to UFH for ECC anticoagulation among end-stage renal disease patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Studies were kept if they reported at least one of the following outcomes: bleeding, lipid profile, cardiovascular events, osteoporosis or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Two independent reviewers conducted studies selection, quality assessment and data extraction with discrepancies solved by a third reviewer. Relative risk and 95% CI was calculated for dichotomous outcomes and mean weighted difference (MWD) with 95% CI was used to pool continuous variables. Results Seventeen studies were selected as part of the systematic. The relative risk for total bleeding was 0.76 (95% CI 0.26–2.22). The WMD calculated for total cholesterol was ?28.70?mg/dl (95% CI -51.43 to ?5.98), a WMD for triglycerides of ?55.57?mg/dl (95% CI -94.49 to ?16.66) was estimated, and finally LDL-cholesterol had a WMD of ?14.88?mg/dl (95% CI -36.27 to 6.51). Conclusions LMWH showed to be at least as safe as UFH for ECC anticoagulation in chronic hemodialysis. The limited number of studies reporting on osteoporosis and HIT does not allow any conclusion for these outcomes. Larger studies are needed to evaluate properly the safety of LMWH in chronic hemodialysis.
机译:背景技术低分子量肝素(LMWH)已被广泛研究,并已成为包括肺栓塞在内的多种适应症的治疗选择。尽管他们在血液透析中的功效被认为与普通肝素(UFH)相似,但它们的安全性仍存在争议,主要是因为肾功能不全患者存在生物蓄积的风险。本系统综述的目的是评估与UFH相比,LMWH在体外循环(ECC)抗凝治疗中的安全性。方法我们使用Pubmed,Embase,Cochrane对照试验中心注册,Trip数据库和NICE检索了无语言限制的相关研究。我们寻找对照实验,比较接受慢性血液透析的终末期肾病患者中LMWH与UFH进行ECC抗凝治疗的比较。如果他们报告了以下至少一项结果,则继续进行研究:出血,脂质状况,心血管事件,骨质疏松症或肝素诱导的血小板减少症。两名独立审稿人进行了研究选择,质量评估和数据提取,而差异由第三名审稿人解决。计算二分结果的相对风险和95%CI,并使用95%CI的平均加权差异(MWD)合并连续变量。结果选择了17项研究作为系统研究的一部分。总出血的相对风险为0.76(95%CI 0.26–2.22)。计算出的总胆固醇的WMD为〜28.70?mg / dl(95%CI -51.43至〜5.98),甘油三酸酯的WMD为〜55.57?mg / dl(95%CI -94.49至〜16.66),最后低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的WMD为〜14.88?mg / dl(95%CI -36.27至6.51)。结论LMWH在慢性血液透析中对ECC抗凝至少具有与UFH相同的安全性。关于骨质疏松症和HIT的研究报道数量有限,因此无法得出任何结论。需要更大的研究来正确评估LMWH在慢性血液透析中的安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号