...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >The cost effectiveness of teriparatide as a first-line treatment for glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Sweden
【24h】

The cost effectiveness of teriparatide as a first-line treatment for glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Sweden

机译:特立帕肽作为瑞典糖皮质激素诱导和绝经后骨质疏松患者的一线治疗的成本效益

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background This paper presents the model and results to evaluate the use of teriparatide as a first-line treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) and Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). The study’s objective was to determine if teriparatide is cost effective against oral bisphosphonates for two large and high risk cohorts. Methods A computer simulation model was created to model treatment, osteoporosis related fractures, and the remaining life of PMO and GIOP patients. Natural mortality and additional mortality from osteoporosis related fractures were included in the model. Costs for treatment with both teriparatide and oral bisphosphonates were included. Drug efficacy was modeled as a reduction to the relative fracture risk for subsequent osteoporosis related fractures. Patient health utilities associated with age, gender, and osteoporosis related fractures were included in the model. Patient costs and utilities were summarized and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for teriparatide versus oral bisphosphonates and teriparatide versus no treatment were estimated. For each of the PMO and GIOP populations, two cohorts differentiated by fracture history were simulated. The first contained patients with both a historical vertebral fracture and an incident vertebral fracture. The second contained patients with only an incident vertebral fracture. The PMO cohorts simulated had an initial Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score of ?3.0. The GIOP cohorts simulated had an initial BMD T-Score of ?2.5. Results The ICERs for teriparatide versus bisphosphonate use for the one and two fracture PMO cohorts were €36,995 per QALY and €19,371 per QALY. The ICERs for teriparatide versus bisphosphonate use for the one and two fracture GIOP cohorts were €20,826 per QALY and €15,155 per QALY, respectively. Conclusions The selection of teriparatide versus oral bisphosphonates as a first-line treatment for the high risk PMO and GIOP cohorts evaluated is justified at a cost per QALY threshold of €50,000.
机译:背景技术本文介绍了该模型和结果,以评估特立帕肽作为严重绝经后骨质疏松症(PMO)和糖皮质激素引起的骨质疏松症(GIOP)的一线治疗的应用。这项研究的目的是确定对于两个大型和高风险人群,teriparatide相对于口服双膦酸盐是否具有成本效益。方法创建计算机模拟模型,以模拟治疗,骨质疏松相关的骨折以及PMO和GIOP患者的剩余寿命。该模型包括自然死亡率和骨质疏松相关骨折的其他死亡率。包括使用特立帕肽和口服双膦酸盐治疗的费用。将药物功效建模为降低后续骨质疏松症相关骨折的相对骨折风险。该模型包括与年龄,性别和骨质疏松症相关的骨折相关的患者保健服务。总结了患者的费用和公用事业费用,并估算了特立帕肽对比口服双膦酸盐和特立帕肽对比未治疗的增量成本效益比(ICER)。对于每个PMO和GIOP人群,模拟了两个根据骨折史区分的队列。首例患者既有历史性椎体骨折,又有椎体意外骨折。第二个只包含脊椎骨折的患者。模拟的PMO队列的初始骨矿物质密度(BMD)T分数约为3.0。模拟的GIOP队列的初始BMD T得分为2.5。结果对于一个和两个骨折PMO人群,特立帕肽和双膦酸盐使用的ICER为每QALY 36,995欧元和每QALY 19,371欧元。对于一个和两个骨折GIOP组,使用特立帕肽和双膦酸盐的ICER分别为每QALY 20,826欧元和每QALY 15,155欧元。结论选择特立帕肽和口服双膦酸盐作为高危PMO和GIOP队列的一线治疗药物,每QALY成本阈值为50,000欧元是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号