首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medicine >The Academic Backbone: longitudinal continuities in educational achievement from secondary school and medical school to MRCP(UK) and the specialist register in UK medical students and doctors
【24h】

The Academic Backbone: longitudinal continuities in educational achievement from secondary school and medical school to MRCP(UK) and the specialist register in UK medical students and doctors

机译:学术骨干:从中学和医学院到MRCP(英国)的教育成就的纵向连续性,并在英国医学生和医生中进行专家注册

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Selection of medical students in the UK is still largely based on prior academic achievement, although doubts have been expressed as to whether performance in earlier life is predictive of outcomes later in medical school or post-graduate education. This study analyses data from five longitudinal studies of UK medical students and doctors from the early 1970s until the early 2000s. Two of the studies used the AH5, a group test of general intelligence (that is, intellectual aptitude). Sex and ethnic differences were also analyzed in light of the changing demographics of medical students over the past decades. Methods Data from five cohort studies were available: the Westminster Study (began clinical studies from 1975 to 1982), the 1980, 1985, and 1990 cohort studies (entered medical school in 1981, 1986, and 1991), and the University College London Medical School (UCLMS) Cohort Study (entered clinical studies in 2005 and 2006). Different studies had different outcome measures, but most had performance on basic medical sciences and clinical examinations at medical school, performance in Membership of the Royal Colleges of Physicians ( MRCP (UK)) examinations, and being on the General Medical Council Specialist Register. Results Correlation matrices and path analyses are presented. There were robust correlations across different years at medical school, and medical school performance also predicted MRCP (UK) performance and being on the GMC Specialist Register. A-levels correlated somewhat less with undergraduate and post-graduate performance, but there was restriction of range in entrants. General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE)/O-level results also predicted undergraduate and post-graduate outcomes, but less so than did A-level results, but there may be incremental validity for clinical and post-graduate performance. The AH5 had some significant correlations with outcome, but they were inconsistent. Sex and ethnicity also had predictive effects on measures of educational attainment, undergraduate, and post-graduate performance. Women performed better in assessments but were less likely to be on the Specialist Register. Non-white participants generally underperformed in undergraduate and post-graduate assessments, but were equally likely to be on the Specialist Register. There was a suggestion of smaller ethnicity effects in earlier studies. Conclusions The existence of the Academic Backbone concept is strongly supported, with attainment at secondary school predicting performance in undergraduate and post-graduate medical assessments, and the effects spanning many years. The Academic Backbone is conceptualized in terms of the development of more sophisticated underlying structures of knowledge ('cognitive capital’ and 'medical capital’). The Academic Backbone provides strong support for using measures of educational attainment, particularly A-levels, in student selection.
机译:背景英国的医学生选拔仍然主要基于先前的学业成就,尽管人们对早期生活中的表现是否预示了医学院或研究生教育后期的结果表示怀疑。这项研究分析了从1970年代初到2000年代初对英国医学生和医生进行的五项纵向研究的数据。其中两项研究使用了AH5,这是一项对一般智力(即智力水平)的小组测试。还根据过去几十年医学生人口统计数据的变化,分析了性别和种族差异。方法可从五项队列研究中获得数据:威斯敏斯特研究(从1975年至1982年开始临床研究),1980年,1985年和1990年的队列研究(1981年,1986年和1991年进入医学院)以及伦敦大学医学院学校(UCLMS)队列研究(于2005年和2006年进入临床研究)。不同的研究具有不同的结局指标,但是大多数研究在医学院的基础医学和临床检查方面都有表现,在皇家内科医师学会(MRCP(UK))的考试中表现出色,并在美国医学总会专家名册中得到了体现。结果给出了相关矩阵和路径分析。医学院在不同年份之间存在很强的相关性,而医学院的表现也预示了MRCP(UK)的表现并被列入GMC专家名册。 A水平与本科生和研究生表现的相关性较小,但进入者的范围受到限制。普通中等教育证书(GCSE)/ O级成绩也可预测本科和研究生的成绩,但不及A级成绩,但临床和研究生成绩可能会有所提高。 AH5与预后有显着相关性,但不一致。性别和种族对教育程度,本科生和研究生的表现也具有预测作用。妇女在评估中表现较好,但在专家名册上的可能性较小。非白人参与者通常在本科和研究生评估中表现不佳,但同样有可能进入专家登记册。早期的研究表明种族影响较小。结论学术骨干概念的存在得到了有力的支持,中学阶段的成就可以预测本科和研究生医学评估的效果,并可以持续多年。学术骨干网是根据知识的更复杂的基础结构(“认知资本”和“医疗资本”)的发展而概念化的。 “学术骨干”为在选择学生时使用教育程度的衡量标准(尤其是A级水平)提供了强有力的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号