首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Adaptation of the Grasha Riechman Student Learning Style Survey and Teaching Style Inventory to assess individual teaching and learning styles in a quality improvement collaborative
【24h】

Adaptation of the Grasha Riechman Student Learning Style Survey and Teaching Style Inventory to assess individual teaching and learning styles in a quality improvement collaborative

机译:修改Grasha Riechman学生的学习风格调查和教学风格清单,以评估质量改进协作中的个人教学风格

获取原文
       

摘要

Background NIATx200, a quality improvement collaborative, involved 201 substance abuse clinics. Each clinic was randomized to one of four implementation strategies: (a) interest circle calls, (b) learning sessions, (c) coach only or (d) a combination of all three. Each strategy was led by NIATx200 coaches who provided direct coaching or facilitated the interest circle and learning session interventions. Methods Eligibility was limited to NIATx200 coaches ( N =?18), and the executive sponsor/change leader of participating clinics ( N =?389). Participants were invited to complete a modified Grasha Riechmann Student Learning Style Survey and Teaching Style Inventory. Principal components analysis determined participants’ preferred learning and teaching styles. Results Responses were received from 17 (94.4?%) of the coaches. Seventy-two individuals were excluded from the initial sample of change leaders and executive sponsors ( N =?389). Responses were received from 80 persons (25.2?%) of the contactable individuals. Six learning profiles for the executive sponsors and change leaders were identified: Collaborative/Competitive ( N =?28, 36.4?%); Collaborative/Participatory ( N =?19, 24.7?%); Collaborative only ( N =?17, 22.1?%); Collaborative/Dependent ( N =?6, 7.8?%); Independent ( N =?3, 5.2?%); and Avoidant/Dependent ( N =?3, 3.9?%). NIATx200 coaches relied primarily on one of four coaching profiles: Facilitator ( N =?7, 41.2?%), Facilitator/Delegator ( N =?6, 35.3?%), Facilitator/Personal Model ( N =?3, 17.6?%) and Delegator ( N =?1, 5.9?%). Coaches also supported their primary coaching profiles with one of eight different secondary coaching profiles. Conclusions The study is one of the first to assess teaching and learning styles within a QIC. Results indicate that individual learners (change leaders and executive sponsors) and coaches utilize multiple approaches in the teaching and practice-based learning of quality improvement (QI) processes. Identification teaching profiles could be used to tailor the collaborative structure and content delivery. Efforts to accommodate learning styles would facilitate knowledge acquisition enhancing the effectiveness of a QI collaborative to improve organizational processes and outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00934141 Registered July 6, 2009. Retrospectively registered.
机译:背景NIATx200是一项质量改进合作组织,涉及201家药物滥用诊所。每个诊所被随机分配到以下四个实施策略之一:(a)兴趣小组召集,(b)学习课程,(c)仅教练或(d)这三者的结合。每种策略均由NIATx200教练指导,他们提供直接指导或促进兴趣小组和学习环节的干预。方法资格仅限于NIATx200教练(N = 18)和参与诊所的执行发起人/变更负责人(N = 389)。邀请参与者完成修改后的Grasha Riechmann学生学习风格调查和教学风格清单。主成分分析确定了参与者偏爱的学与教方式。结果从17名(94.4%)的教练中收到了答复。最初的变更领导者和行政发起人样本中排除了72个人(N =?389)。从可联系的个人中有80个人(25.2%)收到了回复。确定了行政发起人和变革领导者的六个学习概况:协作/竞争(N =?28,36.4?%);协作/参与(N =?19,24.7?%);仅协作(N =?17,22.1?%);合作/依存关系(N =?6,7.8?%);独立的(N =?3,5.2?%);和回避者/依从者(N =?3,3.9?%)。 NIATx200教练主要依靠以下四种教练模式之一:主持人(N =?7,41.2%),主持人/代表(N =?6,35.3%),主持人/个人模型(N =?3,17.6%) )和委派者(N =?1,5.9?%)。教练还通过八个不同的二级教练档案之一来支持他们的主要教练档案。结论该研究是在QIC中评估教学风格的首批研究之一。结果表明,个体学习者(变革领导者和行政赞助者)和教练在基于教学和实践的质量改进(QI)过程学习中采用了多种方法。识别教学资料可用于定制协作结构和内容交付。适应学习风格的努力将促进知识获取,从而提高QI协作的有效性,从而改善组织过程和成果。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00934141,于2009年7月6日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号