首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Study-related behavior patterns of medical students compared to students of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM): a three-year longitudinal study
【24h】

Study-related behavior patterns of medical students compared to students of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM): a three-year longitudinal study

机译:与科学,技术,工程和数学(STEM)学生相比较的医学生与学习相关的行为模式:为期三年的纵向研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Medical education is perceived as demanding and stressful. Whether this is particularly pronounced in this course of study remains under debate. We used the questionnaire “Work-Related Behavior and Experience Patterns (Arbeitsbezogene Verhaltens- und Erlebensmuster (AVEM))” to assess the development of study-related behavior and experience patterns in medical (n?=?584) and STEM students (n?=?757) at one German university, with a special emphasis on gender differences, over 3 years of study. Students were surveyed at the beginning of their studies (t0) and again in each consecutive summer semester (t1-t3). Both cross-sectional and longitudinal data were generated and analyzed. Results in the abstract are from the cross-sectional analysis. Freshman medical students presented with a larger proportion of students with a healthy pattern (58.1%) than STEM students (42.5%). In both groups this proportion decreased to 33.8%/25.1% at t2, with only a minor improvement at t3 (38.1/27.0%). Correspondingly, the proportion of students with a burnout-related risk pattern increased from 8.0% (Med)/13.7% (STEM) to a maximum of 16.9% at t2 in medical students and 27.0% at t3 in STEM students. In both groups female students showed a more unfavorable distribution of patterns and a higher vulnerability, especially in the area of resistance toward stress. The unfavorable development of behavior and experience patterns in both student groups demonstrates increasing study related stress and emphasizes the need for prevention and health promotion on an individual and a contextual level.
机译:医学教育被认为是艰巨且压力重重的。这在本课程中是否特别明显仍在争论中。我们使用调查问卷“与工作相关的行为和经验模式(Arbeitsbezogene Verhaltens- und Erlebensmuster(AVEM)”)评估了医学(n?=?584)和STEM学生(n? =?757)在一所德国大学学习了3年,重点研究了性别差异。在学习开始时(t0)和每个连续的夏季学期(t1-t3)中都对学生进行了调查。横截面和纵向数据均已生成并进行了分析。摘要中的结果来自横截面分析。与STEM学生(42.5%)相比,新生医学学生的健康模式学生比例(58.1%)更大。在两组中,这一比例在t2时均下降至33.8%/ 25.1%,在t3时仅略有改善(38.1 / 27.0%)。相应地,具有倦怠相关风险模式的学生比例从8.0%(Med)/13.7%(STEM)增加到医学生在t2的最高16.9%,STEM学生在t3的最高27.0%。在这两组中,女学生表现出更不利的模式分布和更高的脆弱性,特别是在抗压力方面。两个学生群体中行为和经验模式的不利发展都表明与学习相关的压力越来越大,并强调需要在个人和背景上进行预防和健康促进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号