...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >The Beginning of the Research Stream in Family Medicine Residency Program at McMaster University
【24h】

The Beginning of the Research Stream in Family Medicine Residency Program at McMaster University

机译:麦克马斯特大学家庭医学住院医师项目研究阶段的开始

获取原文

摘要

Background To examine research background, attitudes, knowledge and skills of family medicine residents with regard to primary care research and to compare residents who elected to participate in the research stream with those who did not. Methods Mailed survey of Family Medicine residents at McMaster University in 1998, 70% (52/74) of whom responded. The main outcome measures consisted of research background; attitudes towards primary care research and research activities during residency program; knowledge and skills in applying it in biostatistics, epidemiology, and research design. Results The vast majority of the residents reported previous research experience and/or some training in epidemiology and biostatistics. Residents in the research stream were more likely to be female and were positive towards primary care research: they were more interested in research, more interested in obtaining more research training while a resident, and placed more importance on developing research early in medical education. The research stream residents had stronger views regarding perceived lack of support staff and lack of time for research. There were no statistically significant differences between the research stream and other residents in terms of research knowledge and skills in applying it. Conclusions Attitudes towards research rather than research knowledge or skills seemed to distinguish those selecting to be in our new research stream at the inception.
机译:背景审查家庭医学居民在基层医疗研究方面的研究背景,态度,知识和技能,并比较选择参加研究流的居民和未参加研究流的居民。方法采用邮寄方式对1998年麦克马斯特大学家庭医学住院患者进行问卷调查,其中70%(52/74)做出了答复。主要结果指标包括研究背景。居住计划期间对基层医疗研究和研究活动的态度;将其应用于生物统计学,流行病学和研究设计的知识和技能。结果绝大多数居民报告了以前的研究经验和/或流行病学和生物统计学的一些培训。研究对象中的居民更有可能是女性,并且对基层医疗研究持积极态度:他们对研究更感兴趣,对在住院医师时更多的研究培训更感兴趣,并更加重视在医学教育中早期开展研究。研究人员对被认为缺乏支持人员和缺乏研究时间的观点更为强烈。就研究知识和应用技巧而言,研究流与其他居民之间在统计上没有显着差异。结论对于研究而不是研究知识或技能的态度似乎将那些选择从一开始就加入我们新研究流的人区分开来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号