...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Implementation of team-based learning in year 1 of a PBL based medical program: a pilot study
【24h】

Implementation of team-based learning in year 1 of a PBL based medical program: a pilot study

机译:在基于PBL的医学计划的第一年实施基于团队的学习:一项试点研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A traditional and effective form of teaching within medical education has been Problem Based Learning (PBL). However, this method of teaching is resource intensive, normally requiring one tutor for every ten students. Team-based learning (TBL) has gained recent popularity in medical education, and can be applied to large groups of up to 100 students. TBL makes use of the advantages of small group teaching and learning, but in contrast to PBL, does not need large numbers of teachers. This study sought to explore the efficacy of using TBL in place of PBL in Year 1 of a medical program. In Year 1 of the medical program, two iterations of TBL, with 20 students, were run following four iterations of PBL within the Cardiology teaching block. Student feedback following PBL and TBL was collected by questionnaire, using closed and open ended questions. Additionally, individual and team tests were held at the beginning of each TBL class, and results of each week were compared. All students (n?=?20) participated in the test in week 1, and 18/20 students participated in week 2. In total, 19/20 (95?%) of students completed the questionnaires regarding their PBL and TBL experiences. The use of small groups, the readiness assurance tests, immediate feedback from an expert clinician, as well as time efficiency were all aspects of the TBL experience that students found positive. The clinical problem-solving activity, however, was considered to be less effective with TBL. There was a significant improvement (p?=?0.004) in students’ score from the week 1 assessment (median?=?2) to the week 2 (median?=?3.5) assessment. Interestingly, all teams but one (Team 1) achieved a lower score on their second week assessment than on their first. However, the lowest performing team in week 1 outperformed all other teams in week 2. Students favoured many aspects of the TBL process, particularly motivation to do the pre-reading, and better engagement in the process. Additionally, the application of TBL principles meant the sessions were not reliant upon a large teacher to student ratio. Students, however, highlighted the need for more time within TBL for clinical problem-solving.
机译:基于问题的学习(PBL)是医学教育中一种传统且有效的教学形式。但是,这种教学方法需要大量资源,通常每十个学生需要一名导师。基于团队的学习(TBL)在医学教育中获得了最近的普及,并且可以应用于最多100名学生的大型团体。 TBL利用小组教学的优势,但与PBL相比,它不需要大量的教师。这项研究试图探讨在医学项目的第1年中使用TBL代替PBL的功效。在医学课程的一年级中,在心脏病学教学模块中进行了四次PBL迭代之后,运行了20名学生的TBL两次迭代。通过封闭式和开放式问题,通过问卷收集PBL和TBL之后的学生反馈。此外,在每个TBL课程开始时都要进行个人和团队测试,并比较每周的结果。在第1周,所有学生(n?=?20)参加了测试,在第2周,有18/20学生参加了测试。总计,有19/20(95%)的学生完成了有关其PBL和TBL经历的问卷。小组的使用,准备就绪性测试,专家临床医生的即时反馈以及时间效率都是学生发现的TBL体验的所有方面。然而,临床解决问题的活性被认为对TBL无效。从第1周评估(中位数== 2)到第2周评估(中位数== 3.5),学生的得分有了显着改善(p?= 0.004)。有趣的是,除了一支队伍(第1支队伍)外,所有队伍在第二周评估中的得分都低于第一组。但是,第1周成绩最低的团队优于第2周的所有其他团队。学生们喜欢TBL流程的许多方面,尤其是进行预阅读的动机和更好地参与流程。此外,TBL原则的应用意味着课程不依赖于大型师生比例​​。但是,学生们强调需要在TBL内花更多的时间来解决临床问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号