首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Summative assessment of 5th year medical students’ clinical reasoning by script concordance test: requirements and challenges
【24h】

Summative assessment of 5th year medical students’ clinical reasoning by script concordance test: requirements and challenges

机译:通过脚本一致性测试对五年级医学生临床推理的总结性评估:要求和挑战

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The Script Concordance Test (SCT) has not been reported in summative assessment of students across the multiple domains of a medical curriculum. We report the steps used to build a test for summative assessment in a medical curriculum. Methods A 51 case, 158-question, multidisciplinary paper was constructed to assess clinical reasoning in 5th-year. 10–16 experts in each of 7 discipline-based reference panels answered questions on-line. A multidisciplinary group considered reference panel data and data from a volunteer group of 6th Years, who sat the same test, to determine the passing score for the 5th Years. Results The mean (SD) scores were 63.6 (7.6) and 68.6 (4.8) for the 6th Year (n?=?23, alpha?=?0.78) and and 5th Year (n?=?132, alpha =0.62) groups (p? Conclusions The SCT may be a useful method to assess clinical reasoning in medical students in multidisciplinary summative assessments. Substantial investment in training of faculty and students and in the development of questions is required.
机译:背景技术在医学课程的多个领域的学生的总结评估中,尚未报告脚本一致性测试(SCT)。我们报告在医学课程中用于建立汇总评估测试的步骤。方法构建51例,158个问题的多学科论文,评估第5年的临床推理。 7个以学科为基础的参考小组中的10-16名专家在线回答了问题。一个多学科小组考虑了参考小组数据和来自参加同一考试的第6年志愿者小组的数据,以确定第5年的及格分数。结果第6年(n?=?23,alpha?=?0.78)和第5 年的平均(SD)分数分别为63.6(7.6)和68.6(4.8)。 /年(n?=?132,alpha = 0.62)组(p?)结论SCT在多学科总结性评估中可能是评估医学生临床推理的有用方法。需要发展问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号