...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Surgery >Same-admission versus delayed cholecystectomy for mild acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Same-admission versus delayed cholecystectomy for mild acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:同期入院与延迟胆囊切除术治疗轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) performed after the mild acute biliary pancreatitis (MABP) is still controversial. We conducted a review to compare same-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SA-LC) and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) after mild acute biliary pancreatitis (MABP). We systematically searched several databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) for relevant trials published from 1 January 1992 to 1 June 2018. Human prospective or retrospective studies that compared SA-LC and DLC after MABP were included. The measured outcomes were the rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy (COC), rate of postoperative complications, rate of biliary-related complications, operative time (OT), and length of stay (LOS). The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom). This meta-analysis involved 1833 patients from 4 randomized controlled trials and 7 retrospective studies. No significant differences were found in the rate of COC (risk ratio [RR]?=?1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78–1.97; p?=?0.36), rate of postoperative complications (RR?=?1.06; 95% CI, 0.67–1.69; p?=?0.80), rate of biliary-related complications (RR?=?1.28; 95% CI, 0.42–3.86; p?=?0.66), or OT (RR?=?1.57; 95% CI, ??1.58–4.72; p?=?0.33) between the SA-LC and DLC groups. The LOS was significantly longer in the DLC group (RR?=???2.08; 95% CI, ??3.17 to ??0.99; p?=?0.0002). Unexpectedly, the subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in LOS according to the Atlanta classification (RR?=???0.40; 95% CI, ??0.80–0.01; p?=?0.05). The gallstone-related complications during the waiting time in the DLC group included gall colic, recurrent pancreatitis, acute cholecystitis, jaundice, and acute cholangitis (total, 25.39%). This study confirms the safety of SA-LC, which could shorten the LOS. However, the study findings have a number of important implications for future practice.
机译:轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎(MABP)后进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的时间仍存在争议。我们进行了一项回顾性比较,以比较轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎(MABP)后相同入院率的腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SA-LC)与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术(DLC)。我们系统地搜索了多个数据库(PubMed,EMBASE,Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆),以查找1992年1月1日至2018年6月1日发布的相关试验。包括对MABP后SA-LC和DLC进行比较的人类前瞻性或回顾性研究。测量的结果为开腹胆囊切除术(COC)的转换率,术后并发症发生率,胆道相关并发症发生率,手术时间(OT)和住院时间(LOS)。使用Review Manager 5.3软件(英国牛津的Cochrane Collaboration公司)进行荟萃分析。这项荟萃分析涉及来自4项随机对照试验和7项回顾性研究的1833例患者。 COC发生率(风险比[RR]?=?1.24; 95%置信区间[CI],0.78-1.97; p?=?0.36),术后并发症发生率(RR?=?1.06)没有显着差异。 ; 95%CI,0.67–1.69; p?=?0.80),胆道相关并发症发生率(RR?=?1.28; 95%CI,0.42?3.86; p?=?0.66)或OT(RR?= SA-LC和DLC组之间的差异为±1.57; 95%CI,≤1.58–4.72; p <= 0.33)。在DLC组中,LOS明显更长(RR≥2.08; 95%CI,≥3.17至≥0.99;p≥0.0002)。出乎意料的是,根据亚特兰大分类,亚组分析显示LOS没有显着差异(RR = 0.40; 95%CI,0.80-0.01; p = 0.05)。 DLC组在等待时间内与胆结石相关的并发症包括胆绞痛,复发性胰腺炎,急性胆囊炎,黄疸和急性胆管炎(占25.39%)。这项研究证实了SA-LC的安全性,可以缩短LOS。但是,研究结果对未来的实践有许多重要的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号