...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Prevalence and predictors of having no general practitioner - analysis of the German health interview and examination survey for adults (DEGS1)
【24h】

Prevalence and predictors of having no general practitioner - analysis of the German health interview and examination survey for adults (DEGS1)

机译:没有全科医生的患病率和预测因素-对德国成年人健康访问和检查调查(DEGS1)的分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Although patients in Germany are generally free to choose their primary healthcare provider, this role should mainly be assumed by general practitioners (GPs). While some predictors of the frequency of use of GP services have been reported in international studies, there is still a lack in knowledge what could deter people from contacting a GP in Germany. To improve healthcare, it is important to identify characteristics of people without a GP. This cross-sectional analysis was based on the first wave of the “German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults” (DEGS1) conducted by the Robert Koch Institute in 2008–2011. Descriptive analyses and multiple logistic regression by gender were performed to analyze the association between having no GP and age, gender, residential area, socioeconomic status (SES), marital status, working hours per week, general state of health, chronic diseases and health insurance. Overall, 9.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8.4–10.7) of the 7755 participants stated to have no GP, more often men (11.4%) than women (7.6%). Life in urban areas (big cities vs. rural: adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.9, 95% CI: 2.1–3.9), younger age (18–29?years vs. 65–79?years: aOR: 4.4, 95% CI: 2.5–7.7) and the presence of chronic diseases (yes vs. no: aOR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.3–0.6) showed significant associations of not having a GP. For men, the type of health insurance (private vs. statutory: aOR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5–3.0; other vs. statutory: aOR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.4–3.1) and for women, SES (low vs. medium: aOR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2–2.7; high vs. medium: aOR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.4–3.0) increased the risk of having no GP. Our analysis offers new insights into the use of GPs in Germany and revealed differences between men and women. Public health strategies regarding access to a GP have to focus on men and on women with a low SES. Further analyses are needed to determine whether men with private health insurance prefer to consult a specialist rather than a GP. For young adults, improving the transition process from a pediatrician to a GP could fill a gap in health care.
机译:尽管德国的患者通常可以自由选择其主要医疗保健提供者,但该角色主要应由全科医生(GP)承担。尽管在国际研究中已经报道了使用GP服务的频率的一些预测因素,但是仍然缺乏什么知识可以阻止人们联系德国的GP。为了改善医疗保健,重要的是要确定没有全科医生的人的特征。此横断面分析基于罗伯特·科赫研究所(Robert Koch Institute)在2008-2011年进行的“成人德国健康面试和检查调查”(DEGS1)的第一波研究。进行描述性分析和按性别进行的多因素logistic回归,以分析无全科医生与年龄,性别,居住区,社会经济状况(SES),婚姻状况,每周工作时间,总体健康状况,慢性病和健康保险之间的关联。总体而言,在7755名参与者中,有9.5%(95%的置信区间(CI):8.4-10.7)表示没有全科医生,男性(11.4%)多于女性(7.6%)。城市地区的生活(大城市与农村:调整后的优势比(aOR):2.9,95%CI:2.1-3.9),年龄较小(18-29岁与65-79岁:aOR:4.4、95 CI的百分比:2.5-7.7)和慢性病的存在(是与否:aOR:0.4,95%CI:0.3-0.6)显示没有GP的显着相关性。对于男性,健康保险的类型(私人与法定:aOR:2.1,95%CI:1.5-3.0;其他与法定:aOR:2.1,95%CI:1.4-3.1)以及女性,SES(低与中等:aOR:1.8,95%CI:1.2–2.7;高与中等:aOR:2.1,95%CI:1.4–3.0)增加了没有GP的风险。我们的分析为在德国使用GP提供了新见解,并揭示了男女之间的差异。关于获得全科医生的公共卫生策略必须集中于SES较低的男性和女性。需要进一步分析以确定拥有私人医疗保险的男性是否更愿意咨询专科医生而不是全科医生。对于年轻人来说,改善从儿科医生到全科医生的过渡过程可以填补医疗保健方面的空白。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号