首页> 外文期刊>BMC Palliative Care >Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis
【24h】

Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis

机译:在家中的姑息治疗:研究质量,主要结果和主题成分分析的范围界定审查

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of palliative care is to improve the quality of life of patients and families through the prevention and relief of suffering. Frequently, patients may choose to receive palliative care in the home. The objective of this paper is to summarize the quality and primary outcomes measured within the palliative care in the home literature. This will synthesize the current state of the literature and inform future work. A scoping review was completed using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed,?Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EconLit,?PsycINFO, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database were searched from inception to August 2016. Inclusion criteria included: 1) care was provided in the “home of the patient” as defined by the study, 2) outcomes were reported, and 3) reported original data. Thematic component analysis was completed to categorize interventions. Fifty-three studies formed the final data set. The literature varied extensively. Five themes were identified: accessibility of healthcare, caregiver support, individualized patient centered care, multidisciplinary care provision, and quality improvement. Primary outcomes were resource use, symptom burden, quality of life, satisfaction, caregiver distress, place of death, cost analysis, or described experiences. The majority of studies were of moderate or unclear quality. There is robust literature of varying quality, assessing different components of palliative care in the home interventions, and measuring different outcomes. To be meaningful to patients, these interventions need to be consistently evaluated with outcomes that matter to patients. Future research could focus on reaching a consensus for outcomes to evaluate palliative care in the home interventions.
机译:姑息治疗的目的是通过预防和减轻痛苦来改善患者和家庭的生活质量。通常,患者可能会选择在家中接受姑息治疗。本文的目的是总结家庭文献中姑息治疗中测得的质量和主要结局。这将综合文献的当前状态并为将来的工作提供参考。使用PRISMA指南完成了范围界定审查。从开始到2016年8月,检索了PubMed,Embase,CINAHL,Web of Science,Cochrane图书馆,EconLit,PsycINFO,评论与传播中心,效果评论摘要数据库和国家卫生服务经济评估数据库。纳入标准包括:1)在研究定义的“患者家中”提供护理,2)报告结局,3)报告原始数据。完成了主题成分分析以对干预措施进行分类。 53项研究形成了最终数据集。文献差异很大。确定了五个主题:医疗保健的可及性,护理人员的支持,以患者为中心的个性化护理,多学科护理的提供以及质量的提高。主要结果是资源使用,症状负担,生活质量,满意度,护理人员痛苦,死亡地点,成本分析或描述的经历。大多数研究的质量中等或不清楚。有大量质量各异的文献,评估了家庭干预中姑息治疗的不同组成部分,并评估了不同的结果。为了对患者有意义,需要对这些干预措施进行持续评估,并得出对患者重要的结果。未来的研究可能集中在达成共识以评估家庭干预中的姑息治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号