...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Ethics >Strengthening the ethical assessment of placebo-controlled surgical trials: three proposals
【24h】

Strengthening the ethical assessment of placebo-controlled surgical trials: three proposals

机译:加强安慰剂对照手术试验的伦理评估:三个建议

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Placebo-controlled surgical trials can provide important information about the efficacy of surgical interventions. However, they are ethically contentious as placebo surgery entails the risk of harms to recipients, such as pain, scarring or anaesthetic misadventure. This has led to claims that placebo-controlled surgical trials are inherently unethical. On the other hand, without placebo-controlled surgical trials, it may be impossible to know whether an apparent benefit from surgery is due to the intervention itself or to the placebo effect. Discussion In this paper we investigate justifications for placebo-controlled surgical trials and suggest three measures for strengthening their ethical acceptability. We argue that, given the extent, irreversibility and cost of surgical interventions, there is a need for the best possible evidence about their efficacy. In some cases, the strongest evidence will be from placebo-controlled surgical trials, especially where interventions are for outcomes (such as pain) that are likely to elicit a placebo response. In the second part of the paper, we propose three specific measures to increase the ethical acceptability of placebo-controlled surgical trials. The first is structured consultation with the relevant patient community about the risks and benefits of particular placebo-controlled surgical trials. The second seeks to address the therapeutic misconception through the use of educational materials, informed by patient consultation. Finally, we argue for ethical consideration of non-surgeon clinicians who are necessarily involved in the delivery of placebo-surgical interventions. Summary If there is no appropriate surgical comparator and the risks can be reduced to the absolute minimum (given the type of placebo procedure required), and the research has the support of the relevant patient community, there may be grounds for judging that the potential benefits of specific placebo-controlled surgical trials outweigh the risks. If so justified, the ethical acceptability of placebo-controlled surgical trials can be enhanced through using educational measures to address participant vulnerability, and by recognizing clinicians who are necessary participants in the research.
机译:背景安慰剂对照的外科手术试验可以提供有关手术干预效果的重要信息。但是,它们在伦理上存在争议,因为安慰剂手术会给受者带来伤害的风险,例如疼痛,疤痕或麻醉不良。这导致声称安慰剂对照的外科手术本质上是不道德的。另一方面,如果没有安慰剂对照的手术试验,可能无法知道手术的明显益处是由于干预本身还是由于安慰剂作用。讨论在本文中,我们研究了安慰剂对照手术试验的理由,并提出了三种加强其伦理可接受性的措施。我们认为,鉴于手术干预的程度,不可逆性和费用,因此需要关于其疗效的最佳证据。在某些情况下,最有力的证据将来自安慰剂对照的外科手术试验,尤其是在针对可能引起安慰剂反应的结果(例如疼痛)进行干预的情况下。在本文的第二部分,我们提出了三种具体措施来提高安慰剂对照手术试验的伦理可接受性。首先是与相关患者社区就特定安慰剂对照手术试验的风险和益处进行有组织的协商。第二个尝试通过在患者咨询的指导下使用教育材料来解决治疗误解。最后,我们主张对必须介入安慰剂-外科手术干预措施的非外科医生进行伦理考虑。总结如果没有合适的手术比较者,并且可以将风险降至绝对最低(根据所需的安慰剂程序类型),并且该研究得到相关患者群体的支持,则可能有理由判断其潜在益处特定的安慰剂对照手术试验的风险大于风险。如果有足够的理由,则可以通过采取教育措施来解决参与者的脆弱性,并认可需要研究的临床医生,来提高安慰剂对照手术试验的伦理可接受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号