首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:细针穿刺活检对乳腺肿块的诊断价值:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the breast is a minimally invasive yet maximally diagnostic method. However, the clinical use of FNAB has been questioned. The purpose of our study was to establish the overall value of FNAC in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Methods After a review and quality assessment of 46 studies, sensitivity, specificity and other measures of accuracy of FNAB for evaluating breast lesions were pooled using random-effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize overall accuracy. The sensitivity and specificity for the studies data (included unsatisfactory samples) and underestimation rate of unsatisfactory samples were also calculated. Results The summary estimates for FNAB in diagnosis of breast carcinoma were as follows (unsatisfactory samples was temporarily exluded): sensitivity, 0.927 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.921 to 0.933); specificity, 0.948 (95% CI, 0.943 to 0.952); positive likelihood ratio, 25.72 (95% CI, 17.35 to 28.13); negative likelihood ratio, 0.08 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.11); diagnostic odds ratio, 429.73 (95% CI, 241.75 to 763.87); The pooled sensitivity and specificity for 11 studies, which reported unsatisfactory samples (unsatisfactory samples was considered to be positive in this classification) were 0.920 (95% CI, 0.906 to 0.933) and 0.768 (95% CI, 0.751 to 0.784) respectively. The pooled proportion of unsatisfactory samples that were subsequently upgraded to various grade cancers was 27.5% (95% CI, 0.221 to 0.296). Conclusions FNAB is an accurate biopsy for evaluating breast malignancy if rigorous criteria are used. With regard to unsatisfactory samples, futher invasive procedures are required in order to minimize the chance of a missed diagnosis of breast cancer.
机译:背景技术乳房的细针穿刺活检(FNAB)是一种微创但最大程度的诊断方法。但是,对FNAB的临床使用提出了质疑。我们研究的目的是确定FNAC在乳腺病变诊断中的总体价值。方法在对46项研究进行回顾和质量评估后,使用随机效应模型汇总了FNAB评估乳腺病变的敏感性,特异性和其他准确性度量。汇总接收器工作特性曲线用于汇总总体精度。还计算了研究数据(包括不合格样品)的敏感性和特异性以及不合格样品的低估率。结果FNAB诊断乳腺癌的总概算如下(暂时排除不满意的样本):敏感性0.927(95%置信区间[CI]为0.921至0.933)。特异性0.948(95%CI,0.943至0.952);正似然比为25.72(95%CI,17.35至28.13);负似然比为0.08(95%CI,0.06至0.11);诊断优势比429.73(95%CI,241.75至763.87); 11项研究的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为0.920(95%CI,0.906至0.933)和0.768(95%CI,0.751至0.784),其中11项研究报告的样本不合格(此分类中不合格的样本被认为是阳性)。不满意样本的合并比例为27.5%(95%CI,0.221至0.296),这些样本随后被升级为各种级别的癌症。结论如果使用严格的标准,FNAB是评估乳房恶性肿瘤的准确活检方法。对于不满意的样本,需要进行进一步的侵入性检查,以最大程度地减少漏诊乳腺癌的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号