首页> 外文期刊>Biotechnology Frontier >Discussion about Procalcitonin in the Diagnosis of Blood Stream Infection
【24h】

Discussion about Procalcitonin in the Diagnosis of Blood Stream Infection

机译:降钙素原在诊断血流感染中的讨论

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective Compare different cut-off points of procalcitonin (PCT) in diagnosis of blood stream infection with patients in centre ICU. Methods Data about patients with blood stream infection diagnosed with PCT and blood culture in first afflicated hospital of Chongqing medical university from June 2011 to February 2014 were respectively analyzed. Blood was cultured in Bact/Alert 3D, a fully automatic consecutive detection system. Pathogens were indentified using VETEK 2, a fully automatic microorganism identifier. PCT was detected with VIDAS, a fully automatic immunal analyzer. Results When cut-off point of PCT in diagnosis of blood stream infection with patients in centre ICU is 1.075, the positive rate of PCT was 57.3%. The sensitivity and specificity of PCT were 93.3% and 50.6% respectively with a positive and negative predictive value of 26.1% and 97.6%.When cut-off point of PCT in diagnosis of blood stream infection with patients in centre ICU is 0.5, the positive rate of PCT was 69.6%. The sensitivity and specificity of PCT were 97.8% and 35.7%respectivelywith a positive and negative predictive value of 22.1% and 98.8%.When cut-off point of PCT in diagnosis of blood stream infection with patients in centre ICU is 0.05, the positive rate of PCT was 93.0%. The sensitivity and specificity of PCT were 97.7% and 7.8% respectivelywith a positive and negative predictive value of 15.8% and 95%.Conclusion The detection of PCT has a certain sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of blood stream infection, but we shouldn’t diagnose all patients with the same one cut-off point of PCT. This test shows that for patients in centre ICU, when diagnosed with cut-off point resulted with analysis of PCT values of patients in the same department, the efficiency was higher than diagnosed with cut-off point resulted with analysis of PCT values of patients in various departments. So, the first cut-off point is better in diagnosis of blood stream infection of patients in centre ICU.
机译:目的比较降钙素原(PCT)在诊断重症监护病房(ICU)患者血流感染中的不同临界点。方法对重庆医科大学附属第一医院2011年6月至2014年2月经PCT和血培养确诊的血流感染患者资料进行分析。在全自动连续检测系统Bact / Alert 3D中培养血液。使用VETEK 2(全自动微生物鉴定仪)鉴定病原体。使用全自动免疫分析仪VIDAS检测PCT。结果当诊断为重症监护病房患者的血流感染的PCT的临界点为1.075时,PCT的阳性率为57.3%。 PCT的敏感性和特异性分别为93.3%和50.6%,阳性和阴性预测值为26.1%和97.6%。当PCT在ICU中心患者的血流感染诊断中的临界点为0.5时,阳性PCT率为69.6%。 PCT的敏感性和特异性分别为97.8%和35.7%,阳性和阴性预测值分别为22.1%和98.8%。当PCT在ICU中心患者的血流感染诊断中的临界点为0.05时,阳性率PCT的93.0%。 PCT的敏感性和特异性分别为97.7%和7.8%,阳性和阴性预测值分别为15.8%和95%。结论PCT的检测对血流感染的诊断具有一定的敏感性和特异性,但我们不应该诊断所有患者具有相同的PCT截止点。该测试表明,对于中心ICU中的患者,当通过分析同一部门患者的PCT值诊断出临界点时,其效率要高于通过分析患者的PCT值而诊断出临界点时的效率。各部门。因此,第一个临界点可以更好地诊断中心ICU患者的血流感染。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号