【24h】

Is Chaos Necessary?

机译:需要混沌吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We think of chaos in terms of unpre-dictability, randomness of behavior, un-certainty of outcome: loss of control. It is, however, in terms of human social organization, merely a transitional phase of life. What makes the present era so significant, however, is that we are viewing this transitional phase on a global scale, and it is because of its seeming universality that we wonder at outcomes and time-scales. When will we see a sense of stability and predictability in global structures and affairs, and in our own societies? In other words, when will this cratometamorphosis - this reorganization and transformation of society - reach a stable state? In historical, social terms, what we call chaos is always leveling and horizontal; it tears down, or appears following the destruction of, vertical hierarchies. Did "globalization" and global forms of lateral communi- cation destroy the structured world we knew in the 19th and 20th centuries? Or was global interaction and communication enabled because of the lateralization of access? The same question could have been asked after the globalization generated by the conquests of Genghis Khan and the Mongols in the 12th and 13th centuries.
机译:我们从不可预测性,行为的随机性,结果的不确定性(失去控制)方面考虑混乱。但是,就人类社会组织而言,它只是生活的过渡阶段。然而,使当今时代如此重要的是,我们正在全球范围内看待这个过渡阶段,而正是由于它似乎具有普遍性,我们才对成果和时标产生疑问。我们什么时候会在全球结构和事务以及我们自己的社会中看到稳定和可预测的感觉?换句话说,这种颅骨畸形症-社会的重组和转变-何时才能达到稳定状态?用历史的社会术语来说,我们所说的混乱总是水平和水平的。它会撕毁或在垂直层次结构破坏后出现。 “全球化”和横向交流的全球形式是否破坏了我们在19世纪和20世纪所知道的结构化世界?还是由于访问的偏侧化而实现了全球互动和交流?在12和13世纪,成吉思汗和蒙古人的征服产生了全球化之后,可能会问同样的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号