首页> 外文期刊>Dao >The Zhuangzi and You 遊: Defining an Ideal Without Contradiction
【24h】

The Zhuangzi and You 遊: Defining an Ideal Without Contradiction

机译:庄子和你游:定义一个没有矛盾的理想

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

You 遊 is a crucial term for understanding the Zhuangzi. Translated as “play,” “free play,” and “wandering,” it is usually defined as an ideal, playful Zhuangzian way of being. There are two problems with this definition. The first is logical: the Zhuangzi cannot consistently recommend playfulness as an ideal, since doing so vitiates the essence of you—it becomes an ethical imperative instead of an activity freely undertaken for its own sake. The second problem is performative: arguments for playful Zhuangzi as exemplar resemble those of the logicians and philosophers who appear to come in for Zhuangzian criticism. This essay addresses these tensions by demonstrating how the Zhuangzi ambiguates the nature and value of you. Apparent endorsements of you are not freestanding, instead occurring in grudging replies of teachers to overly zealous students. In light of this recontextualization, a new version of you is offered that accommodates “non-playful” ways of being.
机译:您游是了解庄子的关键术语。翻译为“玩耍”,“自由玩耍”和“徘徊”,通常被定义为一种理想的,嬉戏的装扮方式。这个定义有两个问题。首先是合乎逻辑的:庄子不能一贯地将娱乐性推荐为一种理想,因为这样做会破坏您的本质-它成为道德上的当务之急,而不是出于自己的意愿而自由开展的活动。第二个问题是表演性的:对于嬉戏的《庄子》的论证类似于逻辑学家和哲学家的论证,这些论者似乎参加了《庄子》的批评。本文通过展示庄子如何使您的本性和价值模棱两可来解决这些紧张局势。对您的明显认可不是独立的,而是在恳求老师对过分热心的学生的答复中发生的。鉴于这种重新关联,将为您提供一个新版本,以适应“非嬉戏”的存在方式。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dao》 |2012年第4期|p.479-496|共18页
  • 作者

    Alan Levinovitz;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy and Religion, James Madison University, MSC 8006, Harrisonburg, VA, 22807, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Zhuangzi; Daoism; Play; Comparative ethics; You;

    机译:庄子道教戏剧比较伦理游;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:19:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号