首页> 外文期刊>Critical Studies in Media Communication >The Search for a Purveyor of News: The Dewey/Lippmann Debate in an Internet Age
【24h】

The Search for a Purveyor of News: The Dewey/Lippmann Debate in an Internet Age

机译:寻找新闻的提供者:互联网时代的杜威/利普曼辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The rise of the critical blogosphere has challenged the authority of the mainstream media while sparking discussion concerning the proper relationship between news production and popular democracy in an Internet Age. All too often, however, this discussion is framed as a stark tension between aristocratic defenders of Old Media professionalism and democratic proponents of New Media egalitarianism. Lost in this framing is the tacit agreement, by both sides, that a solution must be found within the constraints of a corporate liberal media structure. This essay argues that if we are to make full use of the opportunities presented to us by new technologies, we must move beyond the discourse of corporate liberalism. Toward this end, I return to the philosophical debate between John Dewey and Walter Lippmann that occurred in the early part of the twentieth century. Based both on their shared principles and their points of departure, I argue that any productive discussion about democratic media reform must begin on the premise that we must supplement the current communication practices of corporate liberalism with noncommercial agencies of cooperative social inquiry and artistic news production. For both Dewey and Lippmann, only through creative investment of public resources can we facilitate intelligent and sympathetic collective judgment in a complex global environment. Their debate concerned only how and where to invest them.
机译:批判性博客圈的兴起挑战了主流媒体的权威,同时引发了有关互联网时代新闻制作与大众民主之间适当关系的讨论。但是,这种讨论经常被视为旧媒体专业主义的贵族捍卫者与新媒体平均主义的民主拥护者之间的强烈张力。双方的默契在于,必须在公司自由媒体结构的约束内找到解决方案。本文认为,如果我们要充分利用新技术给我们带来的机会,我们就必须超越公司自由主义的讨论范围。为此,我回到约翰·杜威和沃尔特·利普曼之间的哲学辩论,该辩论发生在20世纪初期。基于他们的共同原则和出发点,我认为,关于民主媒体改革的任何富有成果的讨论都必须以我们必须以合作社问询和艺术新闻制作的非商业机构来补充公司自由主义当前的交流做法为前提。对于杜威和利普曼来说,只有通过对公共资源的创造性投资,我们才能在复杂的全球环境中促进明智而富有同情心的集体判断。他们的辩论只涉及如何以及在何处进行投资。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号