首页> 外文期刊>Construction manager >Defect disputes: Hochtief-Volker v Atkins
【24h】

Defect disputes: Hochtief-Volker v Atkins

机译:缺陷纠纷:Hochtief-Volker诉Atkins

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When defects arise, it is often debated whether it is a design or workmanship issue. When both are at fault, complications arise. This issue arose in a recent case and the contractor decided to commence proceedings against its designer. Kent County Council had engaged Jacobs Engineering to design two new dual-carriageway roads, the A256 and A299, in east Kent. Hochtief and Volker Fitzpatrick were appointed JV principal contractor and in turn appointed Atkins to complete the design elements. Atkins' scope of work included the permanent civil and structural design for the Cottington Road Bridge and the Cliffsend Underpass.
机译:当出现缺陷时,通常会争论是设计还是工艺问题。当两者都出错时,就会出现复杂情况。这个问题是在最近的一个案件中发生的,承包商决定对它的设计师提起诉讼。肯特郡议会已邀请Jacobs Engineering在肯特东部设计两条新的双行车道,即A256和A299。 Hochtief和Volker Fitzpatrick被任命为合资公司的总承包商,进而任命Atkins完成设计元素。 Atkins的工作范围包括Cottington Road桥和Cliffsend地下通道的永久性土木和结构设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号