首页> 外文期刊>Computers & operations research >Exact methods for three-dimensional cutting and packing: A comparative study concerning single container problems
【24h】

Exact methods for three-dimensional cutting and packing: A comparative study concerning single container problems

机译:三维切割和包装的精确方法:单个容器问题的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Three-dimensional Cutting and Packing Problems consist of a set of items that must be placed inside one or more larger items (containers). Such problems enforce non-overlapping constraints which ensure that the smaller items being assigned must completely fit inside their respective container. Despite extensive preexisting literature, there is the distinct absence of a study comparing exact methods for three-dimensional Cutting and Packing Problems. Therefore, the primary ambition of the present research is to provide a comparative study of the most significant exact methods which have been designed for two variants of this problem class: the Single Large Object Placement Problem and the Single Knapsack Problem. By adapting the selected methods in accordance with the problems being analyzed, a detailed comparison is possible via experimentation using classic benchmarks datasets and newly-generated instances using a Cutting and Packing Generator from the literature. Over 15,000 h of experiments provide information concerning which methods perform best for the considered problems in addition to the scaling behavior and influence of the percentage of the larger item occupancy for each of the tested methods. These results provide further insight concerning performance improvements of existing exact methods and the development of new formulations. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:三维切割和包装问题由一组必须包含在一个或多个较大的项目(容器)中的项目组成。这样的问题强加了非重叠约束,这确保了分配的较小物品必须完全适合其各自的容器内。尽管已有大量文献存在,但显然没有一项研究比较三维切割和包装问题的精确方法。因此,本研究的主要目标是提供针对最重要的精确方法的比较研究,该方法已针对该问题类别的两个变体设计:单个大物体放置问题和单个背包问题。通过根据所分析的问题调整所选方法,可以通过使用经典基准数据集进行实验,以及使用文献中的“切割和包装生成器”生成的新实例进行详细比较。超过15,000小时的实验提供了有关信息,其中除了缩放行为和每种测试方法所占较大项目占用百分比的影响之外,还提供了有关哪种方法对所考虑的问题最有效的信息。这些结果提供了有关现有精确方法性能改进和新配方开发的进一步见解。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号