首页> 外文期刊>Computers & Industrial Engineering >Duopoly pricing of software products under free strategy: Limited-feature vs. seeding
【24h】

Duopoly pricing of software products under free strategy: Limited-feature vs. seeding

机译:自由策略下软件产品的双头垄断定价:功能有限与种子发布

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Adopting free strategy in competitive settings is pervasive in the software market. However, previous studies on free trial pay more attention to monopoly case rather than duopoly case. This paper examines the duopoly case in which one firm adopts the limited-feature free trial strategy and the other employs the seeding strategy. We drive the equilibrium prices and profits of two firms, and explore how the optimal prices and profits are affected by the quality and the service level of free trial version, the network intensity and the seeding ratio. We find that the firm adopting the limited-feature free trial strategy is profitable to provide free trial version of its commercial software with lower quality and better service, and the firm which uses seeding strategy may seed more potential consumers to obtain more profit. We discover the impact of the network intensity is negative on the profit of the firm that adopts the limited-feature free strategy. This result is different from the previous literature on limited-feature free trial in monopoly case. Moreover, the firm which employs seeding strategy prefers higher seeding ratio and stronger network intensity.
机译:在竞争激烈的环境中采用免费策略在软件市场上很普遍。但是,以往关于免费试用的研究更多地关注垄断案件而不是双寡头案件。本文研究了双头垄断案,其中一家公司采用有限功能免费试用策略,而另一家公司采用种子策略。我们驱动两家公司的均衡价格和利润,并探索最佳价格和利润如何受到免费试用版的质量和服务水平,网络强度和播种率的影响。我们发现采用有限功能免费试用策略的公司以提供质量较低,服务更好的免费试用版商业软件是有利可图的,而采用播种策略的公司可能会播种更多潜在的消费者以获得更多的利润。我们发现网络强度的影响对采用有限功能免费策略的公司的利润产生负面影响。该结果与先前关于垄断案件中的有限功能免费审判的文献有所不同。此外,采用播种策略的公司更喜欢较高的播种率和较强的网络强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号