首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >Switching on or switching off? Everyday computer use as a predictor of sustained attention and cognitive reflection
【24h】

Switching on or switching off? Everyday computer use as a predictor of sustained attention and cognitive reflection

机译:开启还是关闭?日常使用计算机来预测持续关注和认知反射

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In response to concerns that modern computer usage habits are having a deleterious effect on cognitive functioning, a study was designed to investigate the relationship between three dimensions of computer usage behaviour and two cognitive abilities: sustained attention and cognitive reflection. Trait mindfulness was incorporated as a potential protective factor for decline in cognitive functioning. A sample of 155 adults was recruited anonymously via Internet sources to complete a computer usage questionnaire, the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, the Cognitive Reflection Test and the Mackworth Clock Vigilance Test. Hierarchical regression models were generated for criterion variables cognitive reflection and sustained attention, with 7 predictors entered in three steps: (a) demographics (age, gender, education); (b) computer usage behaviour (daily computing hours, daily computing sessions, mobile use percentage); and (c) trait mindfulness. Computer usage behaviour and demographics accounted for 12.4% of the variance in sustained attention, with a significant 11.6% uniquely predicted by computer usage behaviour. For cognitive reflection, 13.5% of the variance was explained by combined computer usage and demographics, with a significant 7.4% of unique variance explained by computer usage. Computing hours and computing sessions were significant individual predictors of sustained attention, whereas computing hours, mobile use percentage and gender were significant predictors of cognitive reflection. Trait mindfulness did not significantly contribute to the predictive power for either model, suggesting it is not a protective factor for sustained attention or cognitive reflection. Findings are discussed in relation to dual-process theory, the Baddeley and Hitch working memory model and contemporary social commentary. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:针对现代计算机使用习惯对认知功能产生有害影响的担忧,设计了一项研究来调查计算机使用行为的三个维度与两种认知能力之间的关系:持续关注和认知反射。特质正念被纳入为认知功能下降的潜在保护因素。通过互联网匿名收集了155名成年人的样本,以完成计算机使用情况调查表,正念注意意识量表,认知反射测验和Mackworth时钟警戒测验。产生了用于标准变量认知反射和持续关注的分层回归模型,并在三个步骤中输入了7个预测变量:(a)人口统计数据(年龄,性别,教育程度); (b)计算机使用行为(每日计算时间,每日计算会话,移动使用百分比); (c)特质正念。计算机使用行为和人口统计学占持续关注差异的12.4%,其中11.6%的显着性是通过计算机使用行为唯一预测的。对于认知反射,计算机组合使用和人口统计数据解释了13.5%的方差,计算机使用解释了7.4%的独特方差。计算时间和计算会话是持续关注的重要独立预测指标,而计算时间,移动使用百分比和性别则是认知反射的重要预测指标。特质正念对两种模型的预测能力均无显着影响,表明它不是持续关注或认知反射的保护因素。讨论了有关双过程理论,Baddeley和Hitch工作记忆模型以及当代社会评论的发现。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号