首页> 外文期刊>Computers,environment and urban systems >An urban data framework for assessing equity in cities: Comparing accessibility to healthcare facilities in Cascadia
【24h】

An urban data framework for assessing equity in cities: Comparing accessibility to healthcare facilities in Cascadia

机译:用于评估城市股权的城市数据框架:比较Cascadia的医疗保健设施的可访问性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As cities continue to grow worldwide, policymakers and urban planners face the dual task of meeting rising demand for essential services while ensuring that benefits accrue to their citizens equitably. We propose a framework for assessing inclusivity and equity in cities, which leverages open data and machine learning techniques to inform urban infrastructure investment strategies. The framework is applied at a regional scale to compare differential access to healthcare facilities (public hospitals and clinics) via public transit in Vancouver, Seattle and Portland. We find important distributional impacts on vulnerable populations across the three cities. Portland displays the highest inequity in hospital and clinic access, and Vancouver the least, owing to Vancouver's relatively compact geographic area and high population density. For seniors, over 75% are socially excluded from hospitals and over 50% from clinics in Portland, compared to 30% and 3% respectively in Vancouver. In all three cities, significantly more residents of low-income neighborhoods are excluded from healthcare compared to their counterparts in high-income neighborhoods. This translates into proportionally higher transportation costs for low-income area residents compared with high-income area residents, regardless of whether they are socially excluded or not. Transportation costs are notably high for low-income seniors in Seattle and Vancouver. These findings pose a challenge for inclusive planning, since low-income and senior populations may require specialized services and are more reliant on public transportation than the average population. Our evaluation framework provides a systematic approach for municipalities to account for the distributional effects of transportation and service infrastructure planning, to integrate equity into their decision-making, and to learn from the successes and pitfalls of each other's urban policies.
机译:由于城市继续在全球范围内成长,政策制定者和城市规划人员面临着满足基本服务需求不断增长的双重任务,同时确保公平地享受到其公民的效益。我们提出了一个框架,用于评估城市的包容性和股权,利用开放数据和机器学习技术来提供城市基础设施投资策略。该框架以区域规模应用,通过Vancouver,西雅图和波特兰的公共交通进行比较对医疗机构(公立医院和诊所)的差异访问。我们为三个城市的弱势群体找到了重要的分布影响。由于温哥华的地理区域和人口密度高,波特兰在医院和诊所接入和温哥华中展示了最高不公平性。对于老年人来说,超过75%的社会排除在医院的社会中,并且来自波特兰的诊所超过50%,而温哥华分别为30%和3%。与高收入社区的同行相比,在所有三个城市中,与医疗保健相比,更多的低收入社区的居民被排除在医疗保健中。与高收入区域居民相比,这与低收入区域居民的运输成本相比,这与高收入区域居民相比,无论它们是社会排除还是不一样。在西雅图和温哥华的低收入老年人,运输费用显着高。这些调查结果对包容性规划构成了挑战,因为低收入和高级人口可能需要专门的服务,并且在公共交通方面比平均人口更加依赖。我们的评估框架为市政当局提供了系统的方法,以考虑运输和服务基础设施规划的分配影响,将股权纳入其决策,并从彼此城市政策的成功和陷阱中学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号