首页> 外文期刊>Computers & education >A critique to Akdemir and Oguz (2008): Methodological and statistical issues to consider when conducting educational experiments
【24h】

A critique to Akdemir and Oguz (2008): Methodological and statistical issues to consider when conducting educational experiments

机译:对Akdemir和Oguz(2008)的评论:进行教育实验时应考虑的方法和统计问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the paper "Computer-based testing: An alternative for the assessment of Turkish undergraduate students", Akdemir and Oguz (2008) discuss an experiment to compare student performance in paper-and-pencil tests with computer-based tests, and conclude that students taking computer-based tests do not underperform compared to students taking pen-and-pencil tests. In this letter, we indicate two severe methodological and statistical flaws in this paper. We show how, in general, such flaws can affect experimental research. Due to these flaws, the conclusions by Akdemir and Oguz are unfounded: one cannot reach these conclusions on basis of this design and analysis. We provide a set of guidelines and advices to avoid methodological problems when setting up an educational experiment. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:Akdemir和Oguz(2008)在论文“基于计算机的测试:评估土耳其本科学生的另一种方法”中讨论了一项实验,将学生在纸笔测试中的表现与基于计算机的测试进行比较,并得出结论:与参加笔和铅笔考试的学生相比,参加基于计算机的考试的成绩并不逊色。在这封信中,我们指出了本文中的两个严重的方法和统计缺陷。我们展示了这些缺陷通常如何影响实验研究。由于这些缺陷,Akdemir和Oguz的结论是没有根据的:在这种设计和分析的基础上无法得出这些结论。我们提供了一组指导原则和建议,以避免在进行教学实验时出现方法上的问题。 (C)2015作者。由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号