...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers and Composition >A politics for interactivity: Progressivism and its limits in federal congressional deliberations of distance education policy
【24h】

A politics for interactivity: Progressivism and its limits in federal congressional deliberations of distance education policy

机译:互动性政治:进步主义及其在联邦国会远程教育政策审议中的局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article analyzes federal congressional discourse on distance education policy, describing progressive reformers' use of the term, interactivity. Isolating congressional records of deliberations that treat interactivity, rhetorical analysis first traces progressive legislators' and educators' attempts to use the term to eliminate a restriction on financial aid funding for distance education students. Next, critical analysis describes how legislators and educators have advanced interactivity as a simple educational good. Contrasting legislators' and educators' views on interactivity with perspectives drawn from emerging computers and composition research, this article discusses what the field has to contribute to public deliberation of this issue. A conclusion notes opportunities for researchers' participation in progressive reform efforts.
机译:本文分析了联邦国会关于远程教育政策的论述,描述了进步的改革者对交互性一词的使用。修辞学分析隔离了国会审议互动性的记录,首先进行了修辞分析,以追溯进步的立法者和教育者使用该词消除对远程教育学生的财务资助的限制的尝试。接下来,批判性分析描述了立法者和教育者如何将先进的互动性作为一种简单的教育商品。本文将立法者和教育者关于互动性的观点与新兴计算机和构图研究的观点进行了对比,讨论了该领域在推动公众对这个问题的讨论中所起的作用。结论得出了研究人员参与渐进式改革努力的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号