【24h】

Digital justice

机译:数字正义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a period of growing suspicion about the power of digital technology and ‘tech companies’, this short comment aspires to argue that the conditions for the functioning of the constitutional state contain an inherent obligation for the state not only to be sufficiently sensitive to the changes brought about by digitisation, but also to make use of digitisation. A key condition for the functioning of the constitutional state is e.g. that the judiciary is capable of fully implementing its task of affording legal protection. Reinterpreting this condition in the modern age implies that courts should remain explicitly vigilant when it comes to digitisation. Hence, affording protection is not only a question of what makes formal regulation in a digital world different from regulation in the well-known offline world. If the constitutional state is to be ‘capable’ of implementing its task of affording legal protection, it must also be sufficiently sensitive to the changes brought about by digitisation, as well as deploy the potential that digitisation offers.
机译:在人们对数字技术和“科技公司”的力量越来越怀疑的时期,这篇简短的评论渴望论证宪法国家行使职能的条件包含着国家固有的义务,即国家不仅要对变化足够敏感。由数字化带来,但也要利用数字化。构造状态起作用的关键条件是例如。司法部门有能力充分执行其提供法律保护的任务。在现代时代重新解释这种情况意味着,在数字化方面,法院应保持明显的警惕。因此,提供保护不仅是使数字世界中的正式法规与众所周知的离线世界中的法规不同的问题。如果宪法国家“有能力”执行其提供法律保护的任务,那么它还必须对数字化带来的变化足够敏感,并充分利用数字化所提供的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号