...
首页> 外文期刊>Tolley Communications Law >Vulnerability of international air transport relying on the Global Positioning System: Liability issues
【24h】

Vulnerability of international air transport relying on the Global Positioning System: Liability issues

机译:依赖全球定位系统的国际航空运输的脆弱性:责任问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the realm of ordinary expectation and according to effective legal norms, state liability and responsibility for providing GPS for air navigation purposes in case of damage to aircraft in flight should involve only states concerned and not officials whose actions result in such damage. As to the case where the original service provider is transmitting signals from outer space, there are clear liability provisions in art Ⅶ of the Outer Space Treaty establishing state liability in pecuniary terms for damage caused by that state's activities in outer space. It must also be noted that art Ⅵ of the Treaty makes it absolutely clear that there is a distinction in terms of liability between a state and its subjects. This differs from the usual practice in international law in cases where, individuals in authority negligently misuse their competences. In such a case the international community may proceed with attaching reprehensibility both to the individual as well as to the state concerned, since traditionally, at public international law, the law relating to international responsibility does not necessarily need to be bifurcated into" individual and state responsibility in all circumstances. However, within national parameters, the international community might not be precluded from attaching responsibility to an agent of a state if deliberate intent or gross negligence can be attributed or imputed to such a person. This applies even if the state which is providing air navigation services under art 28 of the Chicago Convention is ultimately responsible.
机译:在一般预期的范围内,并根据有效的法律规范,在飞行中的飞机损坏的情况下,为航空导航提供GPS的国家责任和责任应仅涉及有关国家,而涉及造成这种损害的官员则不涉及。关于原始服务提供者正在从外层空间发送信号的情况,《外层空间条约》第art条中有明确的赔偿责任条款,以金钱条款规定了由该国在外层空间的活动造成的损害的国家赔偿责任。还必须指出,《条约》第六条绝对清楚地表明,国家与其主体之间在责任方面有所区别。这与国际法中的惯常做法不同,在这种情况下,当权者疏忽了其职权。在这种情况下,国际社会可以着手对个人和有关国家予以谴责,因为传统上,根据国际公法,与国际责任有关的法律不一定需要分为“个人和国家”两类。在任何情况下都应承担责任。但是,如果可以将故意或重大过失归因于或归咎于某人,则在国家参数范围内,可能不排除国际社会对某国的代理人承担责任。根据《芝加哥公约》第28条提供空中航行服务的最终责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号