首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive Systems Research >Are unsupervised neural networks ignorant? Sizing the effect of environmental distributions on unsupervised learning
【24h】

Are unsupervised neural networks ignorant? Sizing the effect of environmental distributions on unsupervised learning

机译:无监督的神经网络是无知的吗?评估环境分布对无监督学习的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Learning environmental biases is a rational behavior: by using prior odds, Bayesian networks rapidly became a benchmark in machine learning. Moreover, a growing body of evidence now suggests that humans are using base rate information. Unsupervised con-nectionist networks are used in computer science for machine learning and in psychology to model human cognition, but it is unclear whether they are sensitive to prior odds. In this paper, we show that hard competitive learners are unable to use environmental biases while recurrent associative memories use frequency of exemplars and categories independently. Hence, it is concluded that recurrent associative memories are more useful than hard competitive networks to model human cognition and have a higher potential in machine learning.
机译:学习环境偏见是一种理性的行为:通过使用先验概率,贝叶斯网络迅速成为机器学习的基准。而且,越来越多的证据表明,人们正在使用基本利率信息。无监督的连接器网络在计算机科学中用于机器学习,在心理学中用于模拟人类认知,但是尚不清楚它们是否对先验概率敏感。在本文中,我们表明,努力的竞争性学习者无法利用环境偏差,而经常性的联想记忆则独立地使用示例和类别的频率。因此,可以得出结论,与硬竞争性网络相比,循环联想记忆对人类认知建模更有用,并且在机器学习中具有更高的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号