首页> 外文期刊>Climate Policy >Democracy, electoral systems and emissions: explaining when and why democratization promotes mitigation
【24h】

Democracy, electoral systems and emissions: explaining when and why democratization promotes mitigation

机译:民主,选举制度和排放:解释何时以及为什么民主促进缓解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Does democratization help countries mitigate climate change? On the one hand, by increasing the value placed on quality of life, creating more opportunity for environmental actors to influence policymaking and holding elected politicians accountable, an increase in democratic institution and process should promote emissions reduction. On the other hand, the desire to safeguard individual freedom presumably brings with it an aversion to intervene in lifestyle and market decisions, thereby raising the risk of climate inaction. This outcome is further encouraged by the political need to balance (conflicting) environmental and energy interests. This article evaluates the thesis that democratization promotes mitigation in light of national emissions levels from 1990 to 2012. Using data from the Freedom House, Polity IV and V-Dem indices, World Bank World Development Indicators and the World Resources Institute Climate Data Explorer it conducts a large-N investigation of the emissions levels of 147 countries. Although several quantitative studies have found that domestic political regimes affect emissions levels, this article goes beyond existing research by building a more sophisticated - multilevel- research design to determine whether democracy: (a) continues to be an important driver of emissions when country-level clustering is accounted for and (b) has uniform effects across countries. The results indicate that, even after controlling for country-level clustering and holding constant the other confounding factors, democracy is indeed a significant driver. More strikingly, they reveal that while democracies tend to have lower emissions than non-democracies, democratization spells within the same country do not have the same kind of inhibitory effects as they do between countries. This article also finds tentative evidence that the type of electoral system plays a critical role in shaping the effect of democratization on individual countries. Key policy insights Democracies tend to perform better in terms of emission levels than non-democracies. Democratization has non-uniform effects across different countries, with the type of electoral system playing a key role in determining the effect that democratization has on national emissions. Further research is needed to develop our understanding of how the political context influences emissions, especially with regard to the influence of pro and anti-decarbonisation actors.
机译:民主化是否有助于各国减轻气候变化?一方面,通过增加生活质量的价值,为环境行为者创造更多机会来影响决策,并使民选政治人物承担责任,增加民主制度和程序应促进减排。另一方面,维护个人自由的愿望可能会带来厌恶干预生活方式和市场决策的欲望,从而增加了无为而治的风险。平衡(冲突)环境和能源利益的政治需要进一步鼓励了这一结果。本文根据1990年至2012年的国家排放水平评估了民主化促进缓解的论点。它使用的数据来自自由之家,政治四和五等指数,世界银行世界发展指标和世界资源研究所气候数据浏览器对147个国家/地区的排放水平进行了N次调查。尽管一些定量研究发现国内政治制度会影响排放水平,但本文通过建立更复杂的多层次研究设计来确定民主是否能够超越现有研究:(a)在国家层面,民主仍然是排放的重要驱动力集群被考虑在内,(b)在各国之间具有统一的影响。结果表明,即使在控制国家级集群并保持其他混杂因素不变的情况下,民主确实是一个重要的推动力。更令人吃惊的是,它们揭示了尽管民主国家的排放量往往低于非民主国家,但同一国家内的民主化咒语所产生的抑制作用却与国家之间的抑制作用不同。本文还找到了初步证据,表明选举制度的类型在塑造民主化对各个国家的影响方面起着关键作用。主要政策见解民主国家的排放水平往往比非民主国家更好。民主化对不同国家的影响不统一,选举制度的类型在确定民主化对国家排放的影响方面起着关键作用。需要进一步研究以加深我们对政治背景如何影响排放的理解,尤其是在赞成和反对脱碳行为者的影响方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号