首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews Cancer >Democracy, electoral systems and emissions: explaining when and why democratization promotes mitigation
【24h】

Democracy, electoral systems and emissions: explaining when and why democratization promotes mitigation

机译:民主,选举制度和排放:解释民主化促进减灾的何时以及为何

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Does democratization help countries mitigate climate change? On the one hand, by increasing the value placed on quality of life, creating more opportunity for environmental actors to influence policymaking and holding elected politicians accountable, an increase in democratic institution and process should promote emissions reduction. On the other hand, the desire to safeguard individual freedom presumably brings with it an aversion to intervene in lifestyle and market decisions, thereby raising the risk of climate inaction. This outcome is further encouraged by the political need to balance (conflicting) environmental and energy interests. This article evaluates the thesis that democratization promotes mitigation in light of national emissions levels from 1990 to 2012. Using data from the Freedom House, Polity IV and V-Dem indices, World Bank World Development Indicators and the World Resources Institute Climate Data Explorer it conducts a large-N investigation of the emissions levels of 147 countries. Although several quantitative studies have found that domestic political regimes affect emissions levels, this article goes beyond existing research by building a more sophisticated - multilevel- research design to determine whether democracy: (a) continues to be an important driver of emissions when country-level clustering is accounted for and (b) has uniform effects across countries. The results indicate that, even after controlling for country-level clustering and holding constant the other confounding factors, democracy is indeed a significant driver. More strikingly, they reveal that while democracies tend to have lower emissions than non-democracies, democratization spells within the same country do not have the same kind of inhibitory effects as they do between countries. This article also finds tentative evidence that the type of electoral system plays a critical role in shaping the effect of democratization on individual countries. Key policy insights Democracies tend to perform better in terms of emission levels than non-democracies. Democratization has non-uniform effects across different countries, with the type of electoral system playing a key role in determining the effect that democratization has on national emissions. Further research is needed to develop our understanding of how the political context influences emissions, especially with regard to the influence of pro and anti-decarbonisation actors.
机译:难道民主化帮助国家减轻气候变化?在一方面,通过增加放在生活质量创造价值,为环保行动者影响政策制定更多的机会和保持当选政治家的责任,增加了民主制度和流程应促进减排。在另一方面,以保障个人自由的愿望大概与它带来的避险情绪的生活方式和市场决策进行干预,从而提高气候无所作为的风险。这一成果是由政治需要平衡(冲突的)环境和能源利益进一步鼓励。本文的计算结果,民主化促进减灾从1990年国家排放水平的光2012年从自由之家,政治IV和V-DEM指标,世界银行世界发展指标和世界资源研究所气候数据浏览器它进行使用数据的论文147个国家的排放水平的大型-N调查。尽管一些定量研究发现,国内政治制度影响的排放水平,这篇文章超越了通过建立一个更复杂的现有研究 - multilevel-研究设计,以确定是否民主:(一)继续减排的重要驱动力,当国家一级聚类占和(b)具有跨国家统一的效果。结果表明,即使在控制了国家级别的集群和保持不变的其他混杂因素后,民主确实是一个显著的驱动程序。更引人注目的是,他们透露,虽然民主政体往往比非民主国家的排放量低,在同一个国家内民主化法术不具有相同类型的抑制作用,因为他们国家之间的事。本文还发现初步证据表明,选举制度的类型,在塑造个别国家民主化的影响至关重要的作用。主要政策见解民主往往比非民主国家的排放水平方面有更好的表现。民主化在不同的国家非均匀的效果,与选举制度在确定民主化对国家排放的效果发挥关键作用的类型。需要进一步的研究来发展我们的政治背景如何影响排放的理解,尤其是在亲和抗脱碳行为的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号