首页> 外文期刊>IEEE transactions on circuits and systems. II, Express briefs >Effective Low Leakage 6T and 8T FinFET SRAMs: Using Cells With Reverse-Biased FinFETs, Near-Threshold Operation, and Power Gating
【24h】

Effective Low Leakage 6T and 8T FinFET SRAMs: Using Cells With Reverse-Biased FinFETs, Near-Threshold Operation, and Power Gating

机译:有效的低泄漏6T和8T FinFET SRAM:使用具有反向偏置的FinFet的电池,近阈值操作和功率门控

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Power gating is commonly used to reduce leakage current in SRAM memories; leakage current has a large impact on SRAM energy consumption. We first focus on power gating FinFET SRAMs and then evaluate three techniques to reduce the leakage power and energy-delay product (EDP) of six- and eight-transistor (6T, 8T) FinFET SRAM cells. We compare the EDP savings obtained using: 1) power gating FinFETs; 2) near-threshold operation at $V_{mathrm{ DD}}=0.6$ V instead of the nominal $V_{mathrm{ DD}}=1$ V; and 3) alternative SRAM cells with shorted gate (SG) and low power (LP) configured FinFETs; LP-configuration reverse-biases a FinFET's back gate and reduces leakage current by up to 97%. SRAM cells with higher leakage benefit the most from power gating since they see the largest reductions in leakage current. Sharing power gating transistors among multiple SRAM cells can lead to more leakage current savings, but causes slower read and write speeds which can diminish their effectiveness. Alternative SRAM cells with lower leakage benefit the most from near-threshold operation to further reduce leakage current. Near-threshold operation and/or power gating reduces the 6T SG FinFET SRAM scheme's EDP slightly more than using the 8T SG FinFET SRAM scheme, but using an LP 8T SRAM scheme, such as LP_INV1.2, with near-threshold operation is more effective than power gating and provides the largest reductions in EDP. The design techniques recommended by this brief can enable longer battery life for small sensor systems and thus greater reliability for Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices.
机译:功率门控通常用于降低SRAM存储器中的漏电流;漏电流对SRAM能耗产生了很大影响。我们首先专注于电源门控FinFET SRAM,然后评估三种技术,以减少六和八晶体管(6T,8T)FinFET SRAM细胞的漏电功率和能量延迟产品(EDP)。我们比较使用的EDP节省:1)功率门控FinFet; 2)近阈值操作以$ v _ { mathrm {dd}} = 0.6 $ v而不是名义$ v _ { mathrm {dd}} = 1 $ v; 3)具有短路栅极(SG)和低功率(LP)配置的FinFet的替代SRAM单元; LP-Configuration反向偏置FinFET的后门,并将泄漏电流降低至97%。具有较高泄漏的SRAM细胞有益于电力门控的最大益处,因为它们看到漏电流的最大减少。在多个SRAM单元之间共用电源门控晶体管可导致更多漏电流节省,但导致读取和写入速度较慢,可以减少其有效性。具有较低泄漏的替代SRAM细胞有益于近阈值操作的最大益处,以进一步降低漏电流。近阈值操作和/或功率门控减少了6T SG FinFET SRAM方案的EDP,而不是使用8T SG FinFET SRAM方案,但使用LP 8T SRAM方案,如LP_INV1.2,具有近阈值操作更有效比电力门控,提供EDP的最大减少。此简介推荐的设计技术可以为小型传感器系统提供更长的电池寿命,从而更具可靠性对内容的可靠性(IOT)设备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号