首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering >COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF THREE DIFFERENT NON-CONTACTING FUME TEMPERATURE FIELD MEASUREMENTS
【24h】

COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF THREE DIFFERENT NON-CONTACTING FUME TEMPERATURE FIELD MEASUREMENTS

机译:三种不同的非接触烟气温度场测量结果的比较和分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A much better substitutional means is discussed to calculate the flame temperature field with the application of digital image processing technology. Three non-contacting temperature measurements are used and compared. Such as the traditional two-color temperature measurement, the CCD filtering two-color temperature measurement and the monochromatic temperature measurement. It is indicated that the CCD two-color temperature measurement is not a fully correct means because of its poor theoretical basis. The monochromatic temperature measurement acquires a relatively ideal temperature field distribution in spite of needing a reference temperature. It should be noted that the Abel transformation applied in the plasma diagnosis is for the first time introduced to solve the problem of three-dimensional flame brightness piling.
机译:利用数字图像处理技术,讨论了一种更好的替代方法来计算火焰温度场。使用并比较了三个非接触温度测量值。例如传统的二色温度测量,CCD滤波二色温度测量和单色温度测量。结果表明,CCD两色温测量由于其理论基础较差,并不是一种完全正确的手段。尽管需要参考温度,但单色温度测量仍可获得相对理想的温度场分布。应当指出,在等离子体诊断中应用的Abel变换是首次引入,以解决三维火焰亮度堆积问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号