首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge journal of economics >Innovation, institutions and development: a critical review and grounded heterodox economic analysis of late-industrialising contexts
【24h】

Innovation, institutions and development: a critical review and grounded heterodox economic analysis of late-industrialising contexts

机译:创新,机构和发展:初步审查和基于后期工业化背景的杂交经济分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper critically reviews dominant approaches to the economics of innovationin contemporary developing societies, namely new institutional economics (NIE)and National Innovation Systems (NIS). Both traditions explain capitalist developmentin late-industrialising countries using underlying assumptions and logicsof advanced industrialised societies with respect to transaction costs, path dependence,the nature and structure of institutions and economic history. At their core,both approaches proffer ideal-type institutions as an essentialist route to technologicaland productivity improvement akin to a staged theory of development. TheNIS framework became dominant in scholarly and policy circles but has neglectedthe implication that the concept was developed at the Organisation of EconomicCooperation and Development during the emergence of first-stage neoliberalism.NIE has become an essential analytical toolkit of mainstream economists andinternational organisations promoting competitiveness in developing countries.Analyses of the economic performance of developing countries have thus divergedfrom structural perspectives on development, attributing instead lacklustre technologicaldeepening to certain national features, institutional gaps or linkage failures.The paper exposes narrow assumptions and illustrates that the ‘transition costs’that arise from new socio-institutional configurations during the development processinduces firms and other actors to compete for rents. Conversely, power asymmetries,historical factors and constraining forces in the global capitalist systemgenerate unevenness in productive forces and technological progress. The paperproposes a political economy of technological change that considers the structural,technical and socio-political interdependencies and tensions that underpin transformativepolicies to improve technological, coordination and collective capabilitiesin the economic system.
机译:本文批判性地评估了创新经济学的主导方法在当代发展社会中,即新的机构经济学(聂)和国家创新系统(NIS)。这两个传统都解释了资本主义发展在底层制作的国家使用潜在的假设和逻辑高级工业化社会关于交易成本,路径依赖,机构与经济史的性质与结构。在他们的核心,这两种方法都将理想型机构提供促进的技术人员和生产力改进类似于演出的发展理论。这NIS框架在学术界和政策界中占主导地位,但忽视了该概念在经济组织开发的含义第一阶段新自由主义期间的合作与发展。NIE已成为主流经济学家的基本分析工具包国际组织促进发展中国家竞争力。因此,发展中国家的经济绩效分析了从结构的角度来看,归因于乏味技术深化某些国家特征,机构间隙或联系失败。纸张暴露了狭窄的假设,并说明了“过渡成本”这是从开发过程中的新社会制度配置中出现诱使公司和其他演员竞争租金。相反,权力不对称,全球资本主义制度中的历史因素和约束力在生产力和技术进步中产生不均匀性。本文提出了一项政治经济学经,考虑了结构,技术和社会政治相互依赖性和紧张局势,基础改造改善技术,协调和集体能力的政策在经济体系中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号