首页> 外文期刊>De Economist >Are Occupations Paid What They are Worth? An Econometric Study of Occupational Wage Inequality and Productivity
【24h】

Are Occupations Paid What They are Worth? An Econometric Study of Occupational Wage Inequality and Productivity

机译:是否支付了职业价值?职业工资不平等与生产率的计量经济学研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Labour economists typically assume that pay differences between occupations can be explained with variations in productivity. The empirical evidence on the validity of this assumption is surprisingly thin and subject to various potential biases. The authors use matched employer-employee panel data from Belgium for the years 1999–2006 to examine occupational productivity-wage gaps. They find that occupations play distinct roles for remuneration and productivity: while the estimations indicate a significant upward-sloping occupational wage-profile, the hypothesis of a flat productivity-profile cannot be rejected. The corresponding pattern of over- and underpayment stands up to a series of robustness tests.
机译:劳动经济学家通常认为,职业之间的薪资差异可以用生产率的差异来解释。关于该假设有效性的经验证据令人惊讶地薄,并且受各种潜在偏见的影响。作者使用来自比利时的1999-2006年匹配的雇主-雇员面板数据检查职业生产率-工资差距。他们发现职业对薪酬和生产率起着不同的作用:虽然估计表明职业工资水平有明显的上升趋势,但生产率水平不变的假设不能被拒绝。相应的多付和少付模式经受了一系列的稳健性测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号