首页> 外文期刊>Business week >HERE'S AN IDEA: CUT CORPORATE TAXES
【24h】

HERE'S AN IDEA: CUT CORPORATE TAXES

机译:这是一个想法:削减企业税

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As the saying goes, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. For decades, Washington politicians have tinkered with corporate income tax rules, with the laudable goal ofrngetting U.S. -based multinationals to pay their "fair" share of taxes on growing overseas operations. The result has been a disaster: a corporate tax system that no one understands, that requires vast resources to comply with, and that altogether contributes only 10% of federal revenue, on average. And, oh, yes-the current rules seem to encourage U.S-based multinationals to move jobs overseas.rnUnfortunately, President Barack Obama's latest proposal to get U.S. -based multinationals to pay higher taxes on their foreign profits does nothing to fix these problems. The tax system will become even more complex, an unintentional stimulus package for tax lawyers and accountants. And U.S. -based multinationals will find themselves at a bigger taxrndisadvantage compared with competitors headquartered outside the U.S., which operate under a different set of tax rules. The end result could well be fewer good jobs in the U.S.
机译:俗话说,通往地狱的道路是善意铺就的。几十年来,华盛顿的政客们一直在修改公司所得税规定,​​其可颂扬的目标是让美国的跨国公司为增长的海外业务支付“应有的”税款。结果就是一场灾难:一种没人能理解的公司税制,需要庞大的资源才能遵守,而且平均只占联邦税收的10%。而且,哦,是的,目前的规则似乎鼓励美国的跨国公司向海外转移工作。不幸的是,巴拉克·奥巴马(Barack Obama)总统提出的最新建议,就是让美国的跨国公司为其外国利润缴纳更高的税款,无助于解决这些问题。税收制度将变得更加复杂,这是对税务律师和会计师的无意刺激方案。与总部设在美国境外的竞争对手相比,总部位于美国的跨国公司将面临更大的税收劣势,后者在一套不同的税收规则下运作。最终结果很可能是减少美国的好工作。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Business week》 |2009年第4131期|2022|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:30:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号