首页> 外文期刊>Built environment project and asset management >Public-private partnerships in Tanzanian affordable housing schemes Policy and regulatory issues, pitfalls and solutions
【24h】

Public-private partnerships in Tanzanian affordable housing schemes Policy and regulatory issues, pitfalls and solutions

机译:坦桑尼亚经济适用房计划中的公私伙伴关系政策和监管问题,陷阱和解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to identify and rank policy and regulatory framework factors and inherent pitfalls in the delivery of Tanzanian public-private partnerships (PPPs) affordable housing schemes. The strength of interactions between pitfalls is established, with practical solution proposals offered. Design/methodology/approach - Primary data were collected from questionnaires administered to 28 Tanzanian stakeholders. Semi-structured interviews with public and private sector respondents then complemented survey findings with proposed solutions. The quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, mean scores, parametric tests and correlation analyses. Directed content analysis was used for the interview transcripts. Findings - Results show that "current PPP policy and guidelines need further improvement" and 'Tanzania has a PPP policy and clear regulatory framework" were rated higher as policy and regulatory factors. In contrast, "poor planning skills and analytical capacity", "high cost of building materials" and "inadequate access to housing finance" were the critical pitfalls. Most practical solutions were broadly financial in nature, or related to training, project management or PPP-enabling environment. Originality/value - The paper provides solutions that can be tailored to international practitioners interested in understanding the effects of PPP policy, regulatory issues and pitfalls on Sub-Saharan Africa and other similar developing economies.
机译:目的-本文的目的是确定和排序坦桑尼亚提供的公私合营伙伴计划(PPPs)的可负担住房计划的政策和监管框架因素以及固有的陷阱。陷阱之间相互作用的强度已经确定,并提供了实用的解决方案建议。设计/方法/方法-原始数据是从对28个坦桑尼亚利益相关者进行调查的问卷中收集的。然后,对公共部门和私营部门的受访者进行半结构化访谈,并用提议的解决方案对调查结果进行补充。使用描述性统计,均值,参数测试和相关分析对定量数据进行了分析。定向内容分析用于访谈笔录。调查结果-结果表明,“当前的PPP政策和指南需要进一步改进”和“坦桑尼亚拥有PPP政策和明确的监管框架”被评为较高的政策和监管因素。相比之下,“规划技巧和分析能力较差”,“高关键的陷阱是“建筑材料成本”和“住房融资不足”。大多数实际的解决方案本质上是财务上的,或者与培训,项目管理或支持PPP的环境有关。独创性/价值-本文提供的解决方案可以适合有兴趣了解PPP政策,监管问题和陷阱对撒哈拉以南非洲和其他类似发展中经济体的影响的国际从业者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号