首页> 外文期刊>Building and Environment >A holistic approach to evaluate building performance gap of green office buildings: A case study in China
【24h】

A holistic approach to evaluate building performance gap of green office buildings: A case study in China

机译:评估绿地建筑建筑绩效差距的整体方法 - 以中国为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The rapid development of green buildings world widely has not delivered the anticipated energy related benefits because the real performance of green buildings is not as good as expected. This paper presents a building case study in China by applying a holistic approach which integrates system dynamics and energy performance simulation to evaluate the building performance gap and provide management strategies to minimize the performance gap. The case study in this paper is an office building located in Shanghai, which was awarded "Three Star" in Evaluation Standard for Green Buildings in China (GB/T 50378-2006). Several scenarios including six single management strategy scenarios and four multiple management strategy scenarios are carried out and in each scenario, building performance is analyzed qualitatively in terms of project quality (ranging from 0 to 1), and quantitatively in terms of energy use intensity (kWh/m(2)). The results of this case study are compared to another green office building located in the UK. The cross case mismatch between qualitative and quantitative results is due to four factors that performed better in reality that they were designed. It is demonstrated that multiple factors could help to increase building performance more than single factor especially when management cost was considered. The comparison of the two cases in China and the UK, shows that design factors should be treated in a more stringent way instead of referring values from local standard authorities only which could induce overdesign of the buildings.
机译:绿色建筑世界的快速发展越来越不提供预期的能源相关益处,因为绿色建筑的实际表现并不像预期的那么好。本文通过应用整体方法,展示了中国建筑案例研究,该方法集成了系统动态和能源绩效模拟,以评估建筑性能差距,并提供管理策略,以最大限度地减少性能差距。本文的案例研究是位于上海的办公楼,该建筑位于中国的绿色建筑评估标准中(GB / T 50378-2006)。几种情景包括六种单一管理策略方案和四种多种管理策略方案,在每个场景中进行,在项目质量(从0到1的范围内)和数量地,在能量使用强度(KWH)方面进行了质量分析/ m(2))。这种情况研究的结果与位于英国的另一个绿色办公楼进行了比较。定性和定量结果之间的横向案例不匹配是由于它们的设计更好的四种因素,即它们的设计。据证明,多个因素可以帮助增加建筑物性能,而不是单一因素,特别是当考虑管理成本时。中国和英国两种案例的比较表明,设计因素应以更严格的方式对待,而不是仅从当地标准机构推荐的价值,这可能会导致过度设计的建筑物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号