首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of multiple risk factor interventions for preventing coronary heart disease
【24h】

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of multiple risk factor interventions for preventing coronary heart disease

机译:预防冠心病的多种危险因素干预措施的随机对照试验的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of multiple risk factor intervention in reducing cardiovascular risk factors, total mortality, and mortality from coronary heart disease among adults. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in workforces and in primary care in which subjects were randomly allocated to more than one of six interventions (stopping smoking, exercise, dietary advice, weight control, antihypertensive drugs, and cholesterol lowering drugs) and followed up for at least six months. Subjects: Adults aged 17-73 years. 903 000 person years of observation were included in nine trials with clinical event outcomes and 303 000 person years in five trials with risk factor outcomes alone. Main outcome measures: Changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, smoking rates, blood cholesterol concentrations, total mortality, and mortality from coronary heart disease. Results: Net decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, smoking prevalence, and blood cholesterol were 4.2 mm Hg (SE 0.19 mm Hg), 2.7 mm Hg (0.09 mm Hg), 4.2% (0.3%), and 0.14 mmol/l (0.01 mmol/l) respectively. In the nine trials with clinical event end points the pooled odds ratios for total and coronary heart disease mortality were 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.02) and 0.96 (0.88 to 1.04) respectively. Statistical heterogeneity between the studies with respect to changes in mortality and risk factors was due to trials focusing on hypertensive participants and those using considerable amounts of drug treatment, with only these trials showing significant reductions in mortality. Conclusions: The pooled effects of multiple risk factor intervention on mortality were insignificant and a small, but potentially important, benefit of treatment (about a 10% reduction in mortality) may have been missed. Changes in risk factors were modest, were related to the amount of pharmacological treatment used, and in some cases may have been overestimated because of regression to the mean, lack of intention to treat analyses, habituation to blood pressure measurement, and use of self reports of smoking. Interventions using personal or family counselling and education with or without pharmacological treatments seem to be more effective at reducing risk factors and therefore mortality in high risk hypertensive populations. The evidence suggests that such interventions implemented through standard health education methods have limited use in the general population. Health protection through fiscal and legislative measures may be more effective.
机译:目的:评估多种危险因素干预措施在降低成年人的心血管危险因素,总死亡率和冠心病死亡率方面的有效性。设计:对劳动力和初级保健中的随机对照试验进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,其中受试者被随机分配到六种干预措施中的一种以上(戒烟,运动,饮食建议,体重控制,降压药和降低胆固醇的药) ),并至少随访了六个月。受试者:17-73岁的成年人。在9项具有临床事件结果的试验中包括903 000人年的观察,在5项仅具有危险因素结果的试验中包括303 000人年。主要结局指标:收缩压和舒张压,吸烟率,血胆固醇浓度,总死亡率和冠心病死亡率的变化。结果:收缩压和舒张压,吸烟率和血液胆固醇的净减少量分别为4.2 mm Hg(SE 0.19 mm Hg),2.7 mm Hg(0.09 mm Hg),4.2%(0.3%)和0.14 mmol / l( 0.01 mmol / l)。在9个具有临床事件终点的试验中,总死亡率和冠心病死亡率的合并比值比分别为0.97(95%置信区间0.92至1.02)和0.96(0.88至1.04)。关于死亡率和危险因素变化的研究之间统计上的异质性是由于针对高血压受试者的试验和使用大量药物治疗的试验所致,只有这些试验显示死亡率显着降低。结论:多种危险因素干预措施对死亡率的综合影响微不足道,可能错过了一个很小但潜在重要的治疗益处(死亡率降低约10%)。危险因素的变化不大,与所使用的药物治疗量有关,在某些情况下,由于均值回归,缺乏治疗分析的意图,对血压测量的习惯以及使用自我报告,因此可能被高估了吸烟。使用个人或家庭咨询和教育进行干预,并接受或不接受药物治疗,似乎在降低危险因素和降低高危高血压人群的死亡率方面更为有效。有证据表明,通过标准健康教育方法实施的此类干预措施在普通人群中使用有限。通过财政和立法措施保护健康可能更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号