首页> 外文期刊>British Food Journal >Trust not in money The effect of financial conflict of interest disclosure on dietary behavioural intention
【24h】

Trust not in money The effect of financial conflict of interest disclosure on dietary behavioural intention

机译:信任而不是金钱财务利益冲突披露对饮食行为意图的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine the impact of financial conflict of interest (FCI) disclosure on dietary behavioural intention related to the Glycaemic Index (GI) of food. Design/methodology/approach - A total of 72 participants were randomly allocated to two conditions by reading an academic journal article about GI that contained an FCI disclosure (conflict) or a statement detailing that the authors had no FCI to declare (no-conflict). Using a questionnaire, participants made judgements about the article and authors as well as intention to perform GI-related behaviour. These were then analysed for significant differences between the two conditions. Findings - Although no significant differences emerged between group means of judgements about the article, those in the conflict condition judged the authors as being significantly less trustworthy and credible than those in the no-conflict condition. Contrary to expectation, those in the conflict condition reported significantly higher intentions to perform Gl-related behaviour. Research limitations/implications - The present research must be conducted in other populations of interest in order to establish whether the results can be generalised. Practical implications - The results suggest that FCI disclosure might be best placed at the beginning of articles and that education about FCI be made available to the general public. Originality/value - The paper examines the practical implications of FCI disclosure. It also focuses on a readership beyond an academic community who is well acquainted with the subject area and issues pertaining to FCI.
机译:目的-本文的目的是确定财务利益冲突(FCI)披露对与食品血糖指数(GI)相关的饮食行为意图的影响。设计/方法/方法-通过阅读有关GI的学术期刊文章将FCI披露(冲突)或详述作者没有FCI声明的声明(无冲突),将总共72名参与者随机分配到两种情况。参与者使用调查表对文章和作者以及进行与地理标志有关的行为的意图进行判断。然后分析这两个条件之间的显着差异。调查结果-尽管对文章的集体判断方式之间没有显着差异,但处于冲突状态的判断者比没有冲突状态的判断者可信度和可信度低得多。与预期相反,处于冲突状态的人报告执行与G1有关的行为的意愿明显更高。研究的局限性/意义-为了确定结果是否可以概括,必须在其他感兴趣的人群中进行本研究。实际意义-结果表明,FCI的披露可能最好放在文章的开头,并且应该向公众提供有关FCI的教育。原创性/价值-本文研究了FCI披露的实际含义。它还侧重于学术界以外的读者群,他们对主题领域和与FCI有关的问题非常熟悉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号