首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties >Do boys need different remedial reading instruction from girls?
【24h】

Do boys need different remedial reading instruction from girls?

机译:男孩是否需要与女孩不同的辅导阅读教学?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent inquiries into the underachievement of boys in reading have called into question whether they require different forms of reading instruction from girls. A number of reading programs and initiatives have been developed to address this issue, including programs based on increasing boys' motivation, improving behaviour, embracing the use of computers, and so forth. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that effective remedial reading instruction is equally effective for boys as well as girls. The sample comprised 398 low-progress students (239 boys, 159 girls) in Years 5 and 6, who attended an off-site tutorial centre for two school terms between the years 2005 and 2010. All boys and girls in the sample participated in the Schoolwise Program, a non-categorical, empirically-based reading program, for three hours daily. Participants were assessed pre- and post- intervention on five reading and related measures. Both boys and girls made substantial gains, analyses of covariance confirming that their rates of progress were very similar. Small effect sizes were also reported. It is concluded that boys and girls do not require different forms of reading instruction if both are provided with effective systematic remedial reading instruction.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2011.648331
机译:最近对男孩阅读能力不足的询问使人们质疑,他们是否需要女孩提供不同形式的阅读指导。为了解决这个问题,已经开发了许多阅读程序和计划,包括基于增强男孩的动机,改善行为,拥抱计算机使用等的程序。本研究的目的是检验以下假设:有效的辅导阅读教学对男孩和女孩都同样有效。样本包括5年级和6年级的398名低进阶学生(239名男孩,159名女孩),他们在2005年至2010年期间参加了一个离线学校辅导中心,为期两个学校学期。 Schoolwise计划,一种非分类的,基于经验的阅读计划,每天进行三个小时。干预前和干预后对参与者进行了五项阅读和相关措施的评估。男孩和女孩都取得了可观的进步,协方差分析证实了他们的进步速度非常相似。还报道了小的效应量。可以得出结论,如果男孩和女孩都配有有效的系统性阅读辅导,那么他们就不需要不同形式的阅读指导。查看全文下载全文,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2011.648331

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号