首页> 外文期刊>Acta astronautica >When Policy Structures Technology: Balancing upfront decomposition and in-process coordination in Europe's decentralized space technology ecosystem
【24h】

When Policy Structures Technology: Balancing upfront decomposition and in-process coordination in Europe's decentralized space technology ecosystem

机译:政策结构技术的时机:平衡欧洲分散式空间技术生态系统中的前期分解和进程内协调

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines the decentralization of European space technology research and development through the joint lenses of policy, systems architecture, and innovation contexts. It uses a detailed longitudinal case history of the development of a novel astrophysics instrument to explore the link between policy-imposed institutional decomposition and the architecture of the technical system. The analysis focuses on five instances of collaborative design decision-making and finds that matching between the technical and institutional architectures is a predictor of project success, consistent with the mirroring hypothesis in extant literature. Examined over time, the instances reveal stability in the loosely coupled nature of institutional arrangements and a trend towards more integral, or tightly coupled, technical systems. The stability of the institutional arrangements is explained as an artifact of the European Hultqvist policy and the trend towards integral technical systems is related to the increasing complexity of modern space systems. If these trends persist, the scale of the mismatch will continue to grow. As a first step towards mitigating this challenge, the paper develops a framework for balancing upfront decomposition and in-process coordination in collaborative development projects. The astrophysics instrument case history is used to illustrate how collaborations should be defined for a given inherent system complexity. (C) 2014 IAA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文通过政策,系统架构和创新环境的联合视角研究了欧洲空间技术研发的分散化。它使用了一种新型天体物理学仪器开发的详细纵向案例历史,来探索政策强加的制度分解与技术系统架构之间的联系。该分析着重于协作设计决策的五个实例,并发现技术架构与制度架构之间的匹配是项目成功的预测指标,与现有文献中的镜像假设一致。经过一段时间的考察,这些实例显示出制度安排的松散耦合性质的稳定性,以及趋向于更完整或更紧密耦合的技术系统的趋势。机构安排的稳定性被解释为欧洲赫尔特维斯特政策的产物,而集成技术系统的趋势与现代空间系统日益复杂化有关。如果这些趋势持续下去,不匹配的规模将继续扩大。作为缓解此挑战的第一步,本文开发了一个框架,用于平衡协作开发项目中的前期分解和流程内协调。天体物理学仪器的案例历史用于说明如何针对给定的固有系统复杂性定义协作。 (C)2014 IAA。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Acta astronautica》 |2015年第janaafeba期|33-46|共14页
  • 作者单位

    George Washington Univ, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Engn Management & Syst Engn Dept, Washington, DC 20052 USA;

    George Washington Univ, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Engn Management & Syst Engn Dept, Washington, DC 20052 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Decomposition; Mirroring; Instrumentation; Europe; ESA; Hultqvist;

    机译:分解;镜像;仪器;欧洲;ESA;Hultqvist;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号