...
首页> 外文期刊>Arms Control Today >Too Close for Comfort: Cases of Near Nuclear Use and Options for Policy
【24h】

Too Close for Comfort: Cases of Near Nuclear Use and Options for Policy

机译:太过舒适而无法接近:近距离使用核武器的情况和政策选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The prevailing Cold War narrative says that a shared fear of massive retaliation, known as "deterrence," has prevented the use of nuclear weapons since 1945. This report challenges that notion, finding that nuclear weapons were almost used by mistake numerous times and "that the world has, indeed, been lucky." The report looks at historical cases of "near nuclear use" where the use of nuclear weapons was contemplated and nearly occurred due to "misjudgment and misperception." Examples of near use include the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, when Russian submarine commanders considered the use of nuclear-armed torpedoes, and the failed Soviet coup in 1991 when President Mikhail Gorbachev lost control of the nuclear command "football" for three days. The report identifies reasons that nuclear weapons were not used in these cases, such as adequate decision-making time to identify misinformation and "the decisive role of individuals in following intuition and prudent decision-making, often in violation of protocol." The authors conclude that "the risk associated with nuclear weapons is high" and that as long as nuclear weapons exist, so will the risk of "inadvertent, accidental or deliberate detonation.
机译:流行的冷战叙事说,自从1945年以来,人们对大规模报复的共同恐惧(称为“威慑”)就阻止了核武器的使用。该报告对这一概念提出了挑战,发现核武器几乎被错误地多次使用,并且“世界的确是幸运的。”该报告着眼于“近核使用”的历史案例,其中考虑使用核武器,并且由于“错误判断和误解”而几乎发生了这种情况。近期使用的例子包括1962年古巴导弹危机,当时俄罗斯潜艇指挥官考虑使用核武器鱼雷,以及1991年苏联政变失败,当时米哈伊尔·戈尔巴乔夫(Mikhail Gorbachev)总统连续三天失去了对核指挥部“足球”的控制。该报告指出了在这些情况下不使用核武器的原因,例如有足够的决策时间来识别错误信息,以及“个人在遵循直觉和审慎决策时的决定性作用,常常违反协议。”作者得出的结论是“与核武器有关的风险很高”,只要存在核武器,“无意,意外或故意引爆的风险也将存在”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号