...
首页> 外文期刊>Architectural science review >Southern Drift: The Learning Styles of First-and Third-Year Students of the Built Environment
【24h】

Southern Drift: The Learning Styles of First-and Third-Year Students of the Built Environment

机译:南方漂流:建筑环境的一年级和三年级学生的学习方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper investigates learning processes across a built environment design curriculum through the recognition of the four learning styles defined in the experiential learning theory of Kolb, i.e., 'accommodating', 'diverging', 'assimilating' and 'converging.' The paper focuses on the results of a cross-curriculum learning style survey. The results of the survey appear to explain why many prior studies of the personality characteristics, learning and cognitive styles of practitioners and of design students at different stages of their education appear conflicting. The hypothesis tested to resolve these inconsistencies asked whether design-learning styles are fixed or change as students' progress through their studies. The survey provides evidence of a statistically significant relationship between learning styles and year of study. The evidence suggests a southern drift (the term refers to the spatial interrelationship of styles in the two-dimensional Kolb Learning Style Index [LSI] cycle) towards the abstract conceptualisation mode of the learning process as students near the completion of their studies. This fluidity in learning style remains a hypothesis until further research is able to study one cohort for the entirety of a degree program. The paper argues that the possibility of learning style fluidity needs determining if learning style theory is to provide a workable model for informing the teaching of architecture.
机译:本文通过认可Kolb体验式学习理论中定义的四种学习方式(即``适应'',``分散'',``同化''和``融合'')来研究整个建筑环境设计课程中的学习过程。本文着重于跨课程学习风格调查的结果。调查的结果似乎可以解释为什么先前对从业者和设计专业学生在教育的不同阶段的人格特征,学习和认知风格的许多研究出现矛盾。为了解决这些矛盾而进行的假设检验询问了设计学习风格是固定的还是随着学生学习的发展而改变的。该调查提供了学习风格与学习年份之间具有统计意义的显着关系的证据。证据表明,随着学生即将完成学业,向学习过程的抽象概念化模式向南方漂移(该术语是指二维Kolb学习风格指数[LSI]周期中风格的空间相互关系)。这种学习方式的流动性仍然是一个假设,直到进一步的研究能够研究整个学位课程的一个队列为止。本文认为,学习风格流动性的可能性需要确定学习风格理论是否要为建筑教学提供可行的模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号