首页> 外文期刊>Applied Economics >Who's number one? - ranking college football teams for the 2003 season
【24h】

Who's number one? - ranking college football teams for the 2003 season

机译:谁是第一? -2003赛季大学橄榄球队排名

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article uses the method of pairwise comparisons to rank college football teams. This issue is of some importance due to debate over, which team actually won the national championship in 2003-2004. Some polls ranked LSU number 1 while others ranked USC number 1. Our method, based on pairwise comparisons, finds LSU to be clearly ranked number 1 but USC ends up ranked third behind Miami of Ohio. The Southeastern Conference (SEC) does well in our ranking scheme because the SEC produced not only the best team in the country (LSU) but also the only team to beat the best team in the country (UF). We also find that our ranking does not correspond very closely to rankings in either the AP or Coaches poll. Auxiliary regressions with our rank as the independent variable explain 58 and 50% of the variation in the AP and Coaches rankings, respectively.
机译:本文使用成对比较的方法对大学橄榄球队进行排名。由于争论的缘故,这个问题显得有些重要,哪支球队实际上在2003-2004年获得了全国冠军。一些民意调查将LSU排名第一,而其他民意调查则将USC排名第一。根据成对比较,我们的方法发现LSU显然排名第一,但USC最终排在俄亥俄州迈阿密之后,排名第三。东南会议(SEC)在我们的排名方案中表现出色,因为SEC不仅产生了该国最好的球队(LSU),而且还是唯一一支击败该国最好的球队(UF)的球队。我们还发现我们的排名与AP或Coaches民意测验中的排名并不十分接近。以我们的排名为自变量的辅助回归分别解释了AP和Coachs排名变化的58%和50%。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied Economics》 |2009年第3期|307-310|共4页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36830, USA;

    Department of Economics, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36830, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:48:20

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号