...
首页> 外文期刊>Analytical Letters >Determination of T-2 Toxin and HT-2 Toxin in Milk: A Comparison of Three Formats of Immunoassays
【24h】

Determination of T-2 Toxin and HT-2 Toxin in Milk: A Comparison of Three Formats of Immunoassays

机译:牛奶中T-2毒素和HT-2毒素的测定:三种免疫测定方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This research paper presents a comparative study of three formats of immunoassays, including conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), one-step ELISA, and reverse enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (reELISA), for the determination of T-2 toxin (T-2) and HT-2 toxin (HT-2). This comparative study was performed with regard to specificity, sensitivity, matrix effect, accuracy, and precision. Among the three procedures, reELISA exhibited the best sensitivity with limits of detection (LOD) at 3.04 and 2.79? ng? mLa??1 for T-2 and HT-2. For the other parameters, there were no apparent differences. Good recoveries in negative spiked samples at concentrations of 50, 200, and 500? ng? mLa??1 were obtained, and the values were 67.9-112.9% for conventional ELISA, 60.8-108.8% for one-step ELISA, and 62.7-88.1% for reELISA. The relative standard deviation (RSD) for each procedure was less than 10.3%, 14.0%, and 11.5%, respectively. Among all three methods, the one-step protocol was the most time efficient, and the reELISA procedure exhibited the best sensitivity.View full textDownload full textKeywordsEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, HT-2 toxin, Method comparison, T-2 toxinRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2012.686134
机译:该研究论文对三种测定形式的比较研究进行了比较研究,包括常规酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),一步式ELISA和反向酶联免疫吸附测定(reELISA),用于测定T-2毒素(T -2)和HT-2毒素(HT-2)。进行了有关特异性,敏感性,基质效应,准确性和精密度的比较研究。在这三个步骤中,reELISA的灵敏度最高,检出限(LOD)为3.04和2.79? ng? T-2和HT-2的mL a ?? 1 。对于其他参数,没有明显差异。浓度为50、200和500?的负加标样品中的回收率良好? ng?获得mL a ?? 1 ,常规ELISA的值为67.9-112.9%,一步ELISA的值为60.8-108.8%,reELISA的值为62.7-88.1%。每种方法的相对标准偏差(RSD)分别小于10.3%,14.0%和11.5%。在这三种方法中,一步法最省时,并且reELISA程序表现出最佳的灵敏度。查看全文下载全文关键字酶联免疫吸附测定,HT-2毒素,方法比较,T-2毒素相关变种add add {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”:true,“ ui_click”:true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2012.686134

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号