...
首页> 外文期刊>Analytical Letters >Determination of T-2 Toxin and HT-2 Toxin in Milk: A Comparison of Three Formats of Immunoassays
【24h】

Determination of T-2 Toxin and HT-2 Toxin in Milk: A Comparison of Three Formats of Immunoassays

机译:牛奶中T-2毒素和HT-2毒素的测定:三种免疫测定方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This research paper presents a comparative study of three formats of immunoassays, including conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), one-step ELISA, and reverse enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (reELISA), for the determination of T-2 toxin (T-2) and HT-2 toxin (HT-2). This comparative study was performed with regard to specificity, sensitivity, matrix effect, accuracy, and precision. Among the three procedures, reELISA exhibited the best sensitivity with limits of detection (LOD) at 3.04 and 2.79 ng mL ~(-1) for T-2 and HT-2. For the other parameters, there were no apparent differences. Good recoveries in negative spiked samples at concentrations of 50, 200, and 500 ng mL ~(-1) were obtained, and the values were 67.9-112.9% for conventional ELISA, 60.8-108.8% for one-step ELISA, and 62.7-88.1% for reELISA. The relative standard deviation (RSD) for each procedure was less than 10.3%, 14.0%, and 11.5%, respectively. Among all three methods, the one-step protocol was the most time efficient, and the reELISA procedure exhibited the best sensitivity.
机译:本研究报告对三种测定形式的免疫测定方法进行了比较研究,包括常规酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),一步式ELISA和反向酶联免疫吸附测定(reELISA),用于测定T-2毒素(T -2)和HT-2毒素(HT-2)。进行了有关特异性,敏感性,基质效应,准确性和精密度的比较研究。在这三个程序中,reELISA表现出最佳的灵敏度,对T-2和HT-2的检出限(LOD)为3.04和2.79 ng mL〜(-1)。对于其他参数,没有明显差异。在浓度为50、200和500 ng mL〜(-1)的阴性加标样品中获得了良好的回收率,常规ELISA值为67.9-112.9%,一步ELISA值为60.8-108.8%,62.7- reELISA为88.1%。每个程序的相对标准偏差(RSD)分别小于10.3%,14.0%和11.5%。在所有三种方法中,一步法最省时,而reELISA程序显示出最佳的灵敏度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号