...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Neuroradiology >Refractory Occipital Neuralgia: Preoperative Assessment with CT-Guided Nerve Block Prior to Dorsal Cervical Rhizotomy
【24h】

Refractory Occipital Neuralgia: Preoperative Assessment with CT-Guided Nerve Block Prior to Dorsal Cervical Rhizotomy

机译:难治性枕后神经痛:在颈椎颈总神经切断术前用CT引导神经阻滞术进行术前评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Occipital neuralgia syndrome can cause severe refractory headaches. In a small percentage of people, these headaches can be devastating and debilitating, with the potential for complete relief following surgical rhizotomy. We describe CT fluoroscopy–guided percutaneous C2–C3 nerve block for the confirmation of diagnosis of occipital neuralgia and for demonstrating to patients the sensory effects of intradural cervical dorsal rhizotomy before the definitive surgical procedure. METHODS: Seventeen patients with occipital neuralgia underwent 32 CT fluoroscopy–guided C2 or C2 and C3 nerve root blocks. Of the 17 patients, nine had occipital neuralgia following prior neck or skull base surgeries. On the basis of the positive results of the nerve blocks in terms of temporary pain relief, all 17 patients underwent unilateral (n = 16) or bilateral (n = 1) intradural C1 (n = 9), C2 (n = 17), C3 (n = 17), or C4 (n = 7) dorsal rhizotomies. All patients were followed up for a mean of 20 months (range, 5–37 months) for assessment of pain relief. Sixteen patients were assessed for degree of satisfaction with and functional state after surgery. RESULTS: All patients had temporary relief of symptoms after percutaneous CT-guided block (positive result) and felt that occipital numbness was an acceptable alternative to pain. Immediately after surgery, all patients had complete relief from pain. At follow-up, 11 patients (64.7%) had complete relief of symptoms, two (11.8%) had partial relief, and four (23.5%) had no relief. Seven of eight (87.5%) patients without prior surgery had complete relief of symptoms and one (12.5%) patient had partial relief, as opposed to complete relief in four of nine (44.4%), partial relief in one of nine (11.2%), and no relief in four of nine (44.4%) patients with a history of prior surgery. Because of the small number of patients, this difference was not statistically significant (P = .110). Eleven of 16 (68.8%) patients stated that the surgery was worthwhile. Eight of 16 (50%) patients felt they were more active and functional after surgery, whereas 25% felt they were either unchanged or less functional than before surgery. None of the patients without a history of prior surgery reported a decreased sense of functional activity following rhizotomy. CONCLUSION: CT fluoroscopy–guided percutaneous cervical nerve block is useful for the confirmation of occipital neuralgia, for demonstrating to patients the sensory effects of nerve sectioning, and possibly as a guide for selection of patients for intradural cervical dorsal rhizotomy. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward better response to rhizotomy in patients without prior head or neck surgery.
机译:背景与目的:枕神经痛综合征可引起 重度难治性头痛。在少数人中, 这些头痛可能是毁灭性的和使人衰弱的,而 可能在手术根茎切开术后完全缓解。 我们描述了CT透视引导的经皮C2–C3 神经阻滞用于确诊枕骨神经痛 ,并向患者证明硬膜内 颈背颈切开术的感觉效果方法:17位枕神经痛患者接受了 32 CT透视检查引导的C2或C2和C3神经根阻滞。 在17例患者中,有9例在先前 颈部或颅底手术后出现了枕神经痛。根据暂时性疼痛缓解方面神经阻滞的阳性结果,所有17名患者都接受了单侧(n = 16)或双侧(n = 1)< sup> 硬脑膜背侧根除术C1(n = 9),C2(n = 17),C3(n = 17)或C4(n = 7)。所有患者均接受了平均20个月(5个月至37个月)的随访,以评估疼痛缓解情况。评估16例患者的手术后满意度和功能状态。 结果:所有患者在经CT引导下均暂时缓解了症状。阻滞(阳性结果),并认为 枕骨麻木是疼痛的替代选择。手术后立即 ,所有患者均已完全缓解疼痛。在 随访中,11例患者(64.7%)症状完全缓解, 2例(11.8%)局部缓解,4例(23.5%)无缓解。 未经手术的八名患者中有七名(87.5%)的症状得到了完全缓解,而另一名患者(12.5%)的症状得到了部分缓解, 在9名患者中有4名(44.4%)完全缓解,在9名患者中有1名(11.2%)部分缓解,并且在9名患者中有4名(sup> (44.4%)没有缓解既往手术史。由于 的患者人数很少,因此该差异在统计学上没有统计学意义(P = .110)。 16名患者中有11名(68.8%)表示 该手术值得。 16名患者(50%)中有8名 感觉到他们在手术后更加活跃和有功能,而 25%的患者感觉与 手术前。没有进行过 手术史的患者中,没有人报告过 根除术后功能活动感降低。 结论:CT透视引导下经皮颈椎穿刺术< sup> 神经阻滞可用于确定枕骨神经痛, 用于向患者展示神经切片的感觉效果, 可能作为选择神经痛的指南。硬膜内 颈背椎切开术的患者。尽管没有统计学显着性,但 有一种趋势,患者无需事先进行头部或颈部手术就可以对根茎切开术做出更好的反应。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Journal of Neuroradiology》 |2003年第10期|00002105-00002110|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA;

    Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA;

    Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA;

    Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA;

    Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号