...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of enology & viticulture >Comparison of Two PCR-Based Genetic Fingerprinting Methods for Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Saccharomyces Strains
【24h】

Comparison of Two PCR-Based Genetic Fingerprinting Methods for Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Saccharomyces Strains

机译:两种基于PCR的酿酒酵母菌株遗传多样性评估方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Two molecular methods, interdelta polymorphism fingerprinting of genomic DNA and COX1 intron polymorphism fingerprinting of mitochondrial DNA, were used to characterize 52 strains of Saccharomyces identified to species by 26S rDNA sequencing only in order to assess the potential of these techniques for strain typing and genetic analysis individually and in combination. Two laboratory isolates derived from the same parentage served as a control. Forty-seven S. cerevisiae strains representing a mix of commercial strains and vineyard or winery isolates were used. Five of these strains have been given the commercial designation S. cerevisiae race bayanus. Three strains were identified as S. bayanus, S. kudriavzevii, and S. servazzii from their 26S rDNA sequence and thus may be hybrids. Forty-four genetic patterns were found among the strains by interdelta polymorphism fingerprinting and 47 genetic patterns were found by COX1 intron polymorphism fingerprinting. Each method allowed differentiation of the majority of strains but grouped strains into different clusters. Strains were clustered into eight groups using both techniques in combination. The two laboratory strains clustered together but were in a larger grouping of wine strains. Saccharomyces bayanus, S. kudriavzevii, and S. servazzii were separated from each other but each clustered with S. cerevisiae strains and could not be differentiated from S. cerevisiae by either method. Three of the S. cerevisiae race bayanus strains clustered together but the other two were in different groupings. Of the 10 commercial strains, 904 (French Red) was grouped alone, while 522 (Montrachet) and 905 (Premier Cuvee) were grouped with wild isolates from different areas. Thus both methods reveal patterns of strain similarity but neither method differentiated strains by species or by origin.
机译:基因组DNA的δ多态性指纹图谱和线粒体DNA的COX1内含子多态性指纹图谱这两种分子方法仅用于鉴定通过26S rDNA测序鉴定为物种的52个酿酒酵母菌株,以评估这些技术在菌株分型和遗传分析中的潜力单独或组合使用。来自同一亲本的两个实验室分离株用作对照。使用代表商业菌株和葡萄园或酒厂分离株的混合物的47个酿酒酵母菌株。这些菌株中的五个已被赋予商品名称酿酒酵母种族巴耶努斯。从它们的26S rDNA序列中鉴定出三种菌株为巴氏链球菌,库氏链霉菌和servazzii。通过δ间多态性指纹图谱发现了44个遗传模式,通过COX1内含子多态性指纹图谱发现了47个遗传模式。每种方法都允许区分大多数菌株,但将菌株分组为不同的簇。使用两种技术的组合将菌株分为八类。两种实验室菌株聚集在一起,但在葡萄酒菌株中的分组更大。酿酒酵母,库氏链球菌和servazzii彼此分离,但均与酿酒酵母菌株成簇,并且不能通过两种方法与酿酒酵母区分开。酿酒酵母种族巴彦氏菌菌株中的三个菌株聚集在一起,而其他两个则在不同的组中。在这10种商业菌株中,904(法国红)单独分组,而522(Montrachet)和905(Premier Cuvee)则分别来自不同地区的野生菌株。因此,这两种方法都揭示了菌株相似性的模式,但是都没有按物种或起源区分方法的菌株。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号